on 12-09-2022 12:52 AM
SAP recently released a Note - "3248911 - YE22: Income tax regulation amendment - CPP/QPP additional contributions treated as deduction at source"
This is causing issue if you have split in the very first pay period of the year, for e.g. if your pay period is from 12/25/2022 to 1/7/2023 and you have updated the Tax Info types from 1/1/2023 this results in a payroll split, the calculation for additional contribution is wrong and it is calculating wrong amounts on the newly added WT /308 . There should be no additional calculation since this is the first period and employees has not even reached the CPP contribution limit for 2023
Has anyone else tested this scenario and facing the same issue..
SAP released a Note for this - 3280474 - New factors F5A and F5B incorrectly calculated
Ejaz
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
We are having similar issues. Please share the answer if/when you get this resolved. Thank you.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ejaz,
Thanks....that note did help with the year cross-over. However, we are questioning whether the /308 should even be listed at all. We can't find documentation that anything should be taken out for this, but it is definitely showing on our remuneration statements. Can you confirm that we should be taking out the additional dep pension? Thanks.
Steve French
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Steve,
/308 should not show up on your remuneration statement, so make sure to set the evaluation class to not show on statement. I did the same , as it was showing my statements as well while testing .
/308 is not a deduction that is coming out of the employees pay , it is in fact just used for tracking on how much additional CPP contributions were deducted from source .
Thanks
Ejaz
We applied note 3280474, but it made the situation worse. It threw off our CPP amount more than previously and put even more tax in the /308 for our test employees.
Steve French
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
In the pay period where CPP contribution is being maxed out (PP15, 2023 in our case) and in all the following periods (PP16 to PP26), employee total tax is off by $30ish when comparing with PDOC. it seems that PDOC is still giving additional CPP contribution tax credit even when there is no CPP contribution for the pay period.
Maybe SAP taxes are accurate but PDOC needs an update.
Anyone with the similar issue? Please share your thoughts.
Thanks.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sohaib,
We are having the same issue...that SAP is not matching the PDOCs. CPP and EI match, but the additional pension ded amount is causing us not to match. We applied all the notes, but we are still having /308 appear on our statements. If anybody can confirm that this is correct, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
Steve French
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.