ABAP XSLT Extensions or XSLT (XI imported archive)?

[Former Member]

Hi all,

I would like to know which is having better performance in a scenario with a significant number of messages.

I know that ABAP XSLT Extensions is based in XSLT 1.0 and have some features of XSLT 2.0. So, for me it means some limitations and a disadvantage compared with all of XSLT 2.0 “standard” can offer.

But, my question is related with performance and I just want to know which is faster.

Thanks in advance,

Cheers,

Ricardo.

[MichalKrawczyk · Accepted solution]

Hi Ricardo,

abap xslt has one great advantage

abap stack does not have to communicate with

java stack to perform the - so no RFC calls for mapping

with many messages that might influence their flows

but it wuold be best if you could just test it

in YOUR environment (there are many test tools -

like Loadrunner from Mercury) or you can write your own scripts

and just test in your particular examle which one is better

Regards,

michal

-

---

<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks Michal

Points rewarded ;o)

[MichalKrawczyk · Accepted solution]

no problem

as for the testing Loadrunner

can be used in 21 day (as far as I remember) trial

so I'm sure you can create and test a few

xslts in 21 days on both stacks

testing interface performance is a good thing:)

Regards,

michal