04-16-2010 5:12 AM
Hi all
I am trying to enable a field in the funds commitment transaction - this field is visible on the screen but is disabled.
I looked into the field status groups and field status variants but I can't seem to see the actual field list and the option to enable or disable them. Can anyone help?
Thanks
04-16-2010 6:53 AM
04-16-2010 6:53 AM
04-16-2010 1:21 PM
04-16-2010 1:53 PM
Hello
Overall amount field is calculated by the system, depending on your settings for value adjustments.
See the online help here:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
Funds Management-Specific Postings
Earmarked Funds and Funds Transfers
Processing Earmarked Funds
Changing Earmarked Funds
and
Value Adjustments for Earmarked Funds
So I don't think you can customize it...
cheers
Mar
04-16-2010 2:25 PM
04-16-2010 2:30 PM
Hi again Mar,
One more thing. When i go to FM->FM-specific postings->earmarked funds and fund transfer->field control for earmarked funds and fund transfer.
In this section, i do see field status groups, field status variant relevant for our client and these have been assigned to the right company code. So i presume whoever did config set these up - my question is i cannot seem to find the field list of the fields that have been enabled/disabled/hidden under these field status groups or variants. If this setting is not customizable,, then why would someone even have created field status groups and variants?
I really appreciate your help.
Thanks.
04-16-2010 2:57 PM
Hi, I meant 'overall amount' field only.
Do you mean that this field is ready for input in your other clients?
04-16-2010 3:20 PM
That is correct. When i click on fmx1 in other clients, the overall amount field is enabled.
Thanks.
04-16-2010 6:39 PM
Hi,
The control is in configuration FM > FM Specific Postings > Earmarked Funds and Funds Transfer > Maintain Global Settings. The box ' Value adjustment docs required' controls whether 'Overall amount' is open or not.
Regards,
Ming
04-16-2010 6:50 PM
Minghong,
Thank you so much! You were correct - that value adjustment check box was the difference.
Issue resolved.
Thanks to all of you.
04-19-2010 2:26 PM
04-20-2010 1:22 AM
Mar,
Sorry - i think i looked at your link without carefully reading the rest of your email. You are correct - you said the same thing as well. I have added points for you as well.
Thanks a lot.