on 04-22-2016 8:06 AM
Hi Gurus
We create a sales order in debit memo request type with billing plan and want to create billing document in turn. But when using VF04 we can not find the the order which We only select Order-related. Is there any configuration or order status limit in VF04? Now I can only set blocks(09) in the billing plan which items are not necessary to create billing documents
Regards
Check whether the sale order is not set for Billing Block at header level. Next ensure in the item category "Billing Relevance" is not blank or D and most importantly, the debit memo request should have stored in VKDFS table.
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Xiao, also have a look at the following OSS notes
128947 - Correction of SD document indexes with RVV05IVB
386370 - Check report for the billing due list (billing index)
I'm afraid this is somewhat related to the inconsistency issue since you're able to create debit memo via VF01. Please read the notes carefully and proceed accordingly. Thanks.
Apologies for late reply. Did you execute SDVBUK00 to redetermine sales order status? I believe that the status of your document which needs to be billed is out of sync. Please read solution clauses carefully of OSS note 128947 - Correction of SD document indexes with RVV05IVB something is getting overlooked. Also check if V05I0001 enhancement is activated in your system. Looking forward to your reply in this regard. Thanks.
Xiao, i wonder as if why executing the reports SDVBUK00 and RVV05IVB for selected debit memo requests didn't update VKDFS billing due index. This might sound strange but try removing individual billing blocks for your billing periods and then execute VF04 based on billing date and see what you got in return. In case if you're creating normal debit memo request with billing relevance as 'B' is it appearing in VF04 list? Try changing the billing relevance and then consider the result. Also, make sure that no exit is there which is effecting the update of SD indexes. Last but not least if the issue still persists try debugging the case with the help of your abaper i'm sure there's some discrepancy issue which needs to be rectified. Looking forward to your feedback after trying this all. Thanks.
User | Count |
---|---|
101 | |
12 | |
10 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.