Delivery Completed Indicator set during BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus,

I am using BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT to perform our production confirmation.

I want to force a goods movement item to be "Delivery Completed". I found the field GOODSMOVEMENTS-NO_MORE_GR in the BAPI which has a component type ELIKZ. When i put an X for this item during the BAPI run, it does not change the status of the item in the production order as Final Issue.

Is GOODSMOVEMENTS-NO_MORE_GR equal to the field "Indicator: Goods movement item completed" (ENDKZ) in the confirmation? They have the same description.

I found another field which is GOODSMOVEMENTS-WITHDRAWN (KZEAR) but it also does not change the status of the item after BAPI run.

Thanks in advance for all your help.

Regards,

john

[Caetano]

Hello John

Indicator NO_MORE_GR should be used only for the goods receipt with movement 101 and it will not affect the components.

Field WITHDRAWN is the correct field to be used to set the final issue indicator for a component, however, you must ensure that you are sending the correct reservation number and item.

I suggest you to use BAPI BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_TT_PROP to get the proposed data for the confirmation, including the components, and change the values when necessary.

BR

Caetano

[Former Member]

Hello Caetano,

My problem is the following: When I use the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, I set the WITHDRAWN field with 'X', but when I check the confirmation with the CORT transaction, the "compltd" (or "Concl" in Spanish) indicator is not checked.  Why is the reason for this behaviour?  But, if I do a manual confirmation with COR6N the field compltd is checked.  I don't understand the difference.

Thanks in advance,

Jose

[Caetano]

Hi Jose

Are you sure that you are posting the goods movement with the correct reference to the reservation number and item? If there is no reference to the reservation number and item, the goods movement is considered unplanned and it will not update the reservation.

Regards

Caetano

[Former Member]

This message was moderated.