on 07-30-2007 9:46 AM
Dear All,
i purchase goods from a vendor, he hires the transport (truck) and sends goods to us.
at the time of MIGO, i have 2 delivery notes- one from the vendor who has supplied the goods and the other from the freight carrier.
i want to capture both against each other in MIGO how this can be achieved?
the reason is that during MIRO, i can select individual delivery note and clear there invoice separately.
as the freight payment is made immediately at the time of goods receipt and purchase department is sitting at other location, the purchase department doesnot know which truck on which goods have come belong to which purchase order.
thanks and regards
This can be achieved through selection of vendor in po.
In po u can allot the vendor for transporter in the condition .
you open the freight condition and select this vendor in to this condition.
at the time of miro you can select delivery expenses. automatically this vendor will select.
we can process the invoice with this.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
thanks,
but this was not my question. it is same as proposed by you.
i want to capture <u><b>2 different delivery note number</b></u> in Migo- the one from the vendor and the other from the transporter.
in MIRO we have selection option according to <b>delivery note</b>.
if i go thru the route of PO in MIRO and select goods+ planned cost or only planned cost, then there is no issue at all.
but if i select the delivery note option, then the delivery note that is enteted in MIGO , only those selections comes.
i have already maintained a different vendor for freight condition in po or if require i can change it in MIGO also.
thanks and regards
Hi Steve,
so there is no provision in migo to capture 2 delivery notes.
the proposed solution by you is ok.
if i enter the both, the guy who is doing MIRO for transporter invoices won't be able to find when he selects the option <b>delivery note</b>, as only the delivery note of transporter (paper) goes to him. the ones that comes from vendor is retained by the stores dept.
to add to his misery he even doesnot know the PO number to whom this transport delivery note refers as transporter are not concerned or required to mention it.
i think our process requires change!
thanks and regards
Hi,
But if the supplier quotes the PO number on their documentation and you use the delivery document number for thye freight vendor then surely you have both references.
When the invoice for the items is being processed the PO number should appear on this and so the input person knows what PO it relates to.
When the invoice from the freight supplier is being processed then the delivery note can be used.
Or are you saying that the invoice for ther items does not quote the PO number (it really should).
Steve B
Hi Kavitha Reddy
As soon as you received goods along with two documents, make GR with entry of 1) Vendor's delivery note in "Delivery note" field
and
2) Transporter's delivery note (may be Lorry receipt) in "Bill Of Lading"
If you have not specified the transporter in PO, at GR in item details, enter the transporter code.
So, now you can post invoice of transporter with reference to Bil Of Ladding and
vendor invoice with refernece to Delivery Note.
While you attempt MIRO with reference to Bill Of Ladding, only delivery costs will be fetched over miro screen.
warm regards
sairam akundi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Kavita,
This is an issue faced by all when the transporter is not known in advance and the amount has to be paid to the transporter on receipt of material.
At PO level a freight condition is given with the freight vendor ( if known ). However through " condition SPRO " you can allow person making GR to define the transport vendor ( different than PO ( the transporter must have a vcode though). ( The value though cannot be entered at the GR Level.) This books the freight value on the inventory.
The actual payment can then be done against the delivery cost with MIRO. Since value cannot be entered at the time of GR, there will be a difference between system proposed value and the actual freight value during GR. This will get loaded on inventory ( incase of MAP) or to diff account ( in case of std. price and depending on the customising setting.
Crux is, at best you can give the control of transport vendor selection to person making GR but not value.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Rajeev
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello
In subcontracting scenario, when we will provide a material to Vendor, at that time material is goes out of the gate , in sub contracting scenario, how to make Gate Pass for that material.
at time of ME2O.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Kavita,
This can be acheived at MIRO level to do this, you have to maintain freight condition in PO & assign vendor for that cost against freight condition so that at the time of MIRO once you select delivery cost only upto that value is poped up for payment.
Regards
Rang
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
thanks Rang,
but this was not my question. it is same as proposed by you.
i want to capture <u><b>2 different delivery note number</b></u> in Migo- the one from the vendor and the other from the transporter.
in MIRO we have selection option according to <b>delivery note</b>.
if i go thru the route of PO in MIRO and select goods+ planned cost or only planned cost, then there is no issue at all.
but if i select the delivery note option, then the delivery note that is enteted in MIGO , only those selections comes.
i have already maintained a different vendor for freight condition in po or if require i can change it in MIGO also.
thanks and regards
User | Count |
---|---|
94 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.