Skip to Content
0
Former Member
May 29, 2007 at 10:56 AM

Photo-bloggers

9 Views

SDN Team,

This happens for second time, and this is done by SAP employees, so I want to raise the question stated by Anton (comments-on-sdn's-new-blogging-policy) again:

Ain't it's necessary to pass SAP employees through regular SDN blogging procedure?

Take a look at this:

/people/community.user/blog/2007/05/24/approach-to-mobilise-non-sap-application-using-sap-mi--step-1-creation-of-proxy-object

/people/community.user/blog/2007/05/27/approach-to-mobilise-non-sap-application-using-sap-mi--step-2-creation-of-logical-port

/people/community.user/blog/2007/05/28/approach-to-mobilise-non-sap-application-using-sap-mi-step-3-creation-of-bapi-wrappers

/people/community.user/blog/2007/05/28/approach-to-mobilise-non-sap-application-using-sap-mi--step-final-creation-of-syncbo-and-viewing-the-data-in-merepmon

Nonsense in 4 parts... Screen cast with sequel... "The picture worth a thousands words" taken to extreme...

Previously I saw similar nonsense in 7(!) parts, posted by SAP employee as well.

We haven't seen such for a long time. To be exact, new blogging policy save us from such crap. And the only persons that has rights to bypass this policy is SAP employees -- so the question is: if system fails twice due to same error, isn't it right time to fix this error?

VS