Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Internal Order Settlement - KO88

Hi SCN Experts,

We have Purchase Orders created with account assignment category "F". Thats is with account assignment Order.

We have many goods receipts getting posted during month. and during month end, we will settle the Order on KO88 on percentage basis to respective AUC assets and usually the Order to AUC combination is 1:2. When we are doing the settlement on KO88, the total sum of the GR is getting settled to AUC's in a single line item with no trace of PO number at AUC level.

For better capitalization process, we strongly need to have the trace of PO and want to the see line item settled to AUC instead of total amount of GR. These IO's are not created as investment measures.

I tried using KOB5, but system doesn't allow line item settlement as the IO are not created as Investment measures.

Please help to let me know how to achieve this in SAP with any configuration change if required.


Voona Vivek

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Assigned Tags

Related questions

3 Answers

  • Best Answer
    Posted on Dec 07, 2015 at 06:37 PM

    Hi Vivek

    What you want is only possible with Investment Order.. Line items are managed only in Invt Order, but not in the Normal internal order

    After you settle, may be you can try the report (Se38) RAHERK01 or 02.. It shows you the origins.. See if it helps

    If you are careful while setting up the settlement rules, it should be good enough

    If implementing the Investment Orders is ruled out as of now, I would suggest replace Int Order with AUC Asset in your PO i.e. use Acct Assignment Catg A instead of F... in the AUC, every line item will be shown separately


    Ajay M

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on Dec 07, 2015 at 07:38 AM

    Hi Voona

    For this, the allocation structure assigned to the settlement profile of your order type should have settlement cost elements as 'By Elements' rather than 'Settlement Cost Element';

    Let me know if this fulfill your requirment?


    Syed Zia Abbas

    1.png (15.8 kB)
    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Syed Zia Abbas

      Hi Syed,

      Do you think if there is anyway we can use KOB5 with configuration change here? Even if the PO number doesn't appear its fine. At least instead of summing up, if it just do settlement based on each line item that would be great.

      Meanwhile I will try for the substitution suggested by you and update here.



  • Posted on Dec 07, 2015 at 07:40 AM


    we was using last year we was capitalizing the asset using this procedure in order to use internal order budgeting advantage to prevent extra spending.. y

    recently we moved to the below asset purchasing cycle which give us better view and linking between asset /AUC and its GR P.O's

    Budget on Asset Purchase

    you may check this doc. it might provide better asset purchasing steps.


    Mahmoud EL Nady

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.