Signavio - Duplicate Content

[zlatanbahovic]

[EACSPX] Why are there duplicate flows in same folder for certain pre-delivered content i.e. J60? How do we see critical attributes to easily identify the correct diagram for us to reference/link to?

[former_member857788]

The SAP Value Accelerator (VAC) content includes multiple editions of the same processes for each of the variations of the S/4HANA solution (Cloud and region editions), so for J60 there are two diagrams which are linked to SAP/EARL/SolutionProcess dictionary objects and on these Dictionary objects you can see the following attributes which show the edition, version and country. The difficult is that the search capabilities in Signavio do not allow you to query any of these attributes to filter and locate the CORRECT editions of the processes without inspecting the dictionary object.

hasGranularityCountryRegionDEhasGranularityVersion3.0hasPrerequisiteSolutionComponentSAP S/4HANA Cloud (SC-003 1.0)

[former_member47058]

Hello,

that´s a fair feedback and response. Let me at least draw the currently available ways to get the related information.

1) Directly via dictionary object “J60” EARL/SAD/SolutionProcess gives you the related country information and has all related processes linked “Used in processes”

2) Selection via SAP Product Portfolio -> SAP S/4HANA Best Practices default is “Germany” it possible to switch to another country e.g., USA via “Select Other Version” -> open relevant business area e.g., Financial Operations (S/4HANA On-Premise, Germany) and click on Accounts Payable (J60) which gives a list of all related processes for that particular version.

In addition, there is an external roadmap item from SAP Signavio Collaboration Hub for improved Global search filters to find content faster with filters on all supported content types.

[Neeraj_Jain]

Hello zlatanbahovic,

Please refer below SAP document link.

https://documentation.signavio.com/suite/en-us/Content/workflow-accelerator/userguide/processes/copy...

Confirm if it's works for you.

Regards,

Neeraj Jain

[zlatanbahovic]

Hi Neeraj,

please see David's question for further clarification on the need.

Thanks,

Z