We have been performing testing in a new S4H 2023 SAP instance and have noticed specific transactions on FAGLFLEXA & ACDOCA that appear to have incorrect posting keys and debit / credit indicators compared to the signage of the value on the table. There are examples where all line items for a document are debit entries (i.e. S) but the signage of the line items are both positive and negative. These anomalies appear to only relate to entries marked with the following:
Doc. Status (BSTAT) = U
Transaction (ACTIV) = GRRA
Reference Transaction (AWTYP) = GRRFP
Line-item reports also reflect the Positive and Negative values - even though this does not align with the Debit/credit indicator or posting key.
As a result - any reporting off FAGLFLEXA/ACDOCA using Debit/Credit indicators results in incorrect determination of values.
Is there specific logic to be applied to these types of entries, or is this a bug in the 2023 S4H system that requires a note to fix?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.