cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Vendor and Delivery address are from same state and different city. CFOP determination error.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Brazil process : In Nota fiscal generated while doing invoice verification. CFOP determined is 2352 where 2 denotes different state.

But vendor is from Santos( State SP) and delivery address of plant Jaguarina( State SP). Hence CFOP determined should have been 1352( 1 refers to same state)

Actually, This is intercompany transfer between plant from US and Brazil. But if i look at invoice( freight invoice) which has Nota fiscal button . Vendor is in from same State as that of receiving plant. I think focus of analysis should be on this freight invoice and not on Intercompany invoice or any other invoice.

CFOP is determined as per table J_1BAON

Not sure how Destination category is being determined.

CFOP is determined based on:

Now, why system picks up 2352 as CFOP and not 1352 despite of having same state of both vendor and delivery address.

View Entire Topic
former_member217316
Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ashutosh

If you ask your ABAPer to debug INCLUDE LJ1BCF02, you will find that the destination category is determined by country and region comparison. There seems to be a mismatch in the regions as they are being compared between the PO vendor's region (which is of a different country) and the plant.

Thus, this error.

Hope this helps.

Harsh