T004F and V_T004F - Interpret Field Status Groups

[joscha_tilgner]

Hi,

does anyone know how to intepret the T004F table regarding the field status groups.

I already found the intepretation of the +-. smybols but it is still unclear to me at which position I can find the right entry that matches the radio buttons in V_T004F.

Unfortunately they don't seem to be aligned in any order I am able to figure out.

BR Joscha

[former_member30]

Hi and welcome to the SAP Community!

Thank you for visiting SAP Community to get answers to your questions. Since you're asking a question here for the first time, I recommend that you familiarize yourself with https://community.sap.com/resources/questions-and-answers (if you haven't already), as it provides tips for preparing questions that draw responses from our members. For example, you can outline what steps you took to find answers (and why they weren't helpful). The more details you provide, the more likely it is that members will be able to assist you. Should you wish, you can revise your question by selecting Actions, then Edit (although once someone answers your question, you'll lose the ability to edit the question -- but if that happens, you can leave more details in a comment). Finally, if you're hoping to connect with readers, please consider adding a picture to your profile. Here's how you do it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5JdUbyjfMA&list=PLpQebylHrdh5s3gwy-h6RtymfDpoz3vDS. By personalizing your profile with a photo of you, you encourage readers to respond.

Cheers,

Julia SAP Community Moderator

[TammyPowlas]

Maybe run report RM07CUFA to see if that helps? It is just a guess (for me)

[joscha_tilgner]

Hi tammy.powlas3 ,

if I see it correctly the report RMO7CUFA only shows me a specific field status group and which accounts will use it.

My main goal is to interepret the T004F correctly to have an overall overview regarding all field status groups.

BR Joscha

[sekarvijay]

Did you get an Answer for this question? I am looking for the same info, to find the table that stores the field selection options of each Field Status group. The T004F has the flags for Suppressed/required/optional but it doesnt match with the field flag selections for me. For ex: FSG - G001 has 'Settlement Period' as Suppressed but the T004F-FAUS1 has a different value and also i am not sure what is FAUS2. Please help!

[brahms86]

Hi,

if you go to the transaction to display any particular field status group, then you simply need to count the fields from top to bottom, not skipping any of the groups. This is how you can identify a particular flag. Also refer to tables TMODF (for key SKB1-FAUS1) and TMODU. I think there is also a FM to query this structure, but I would need to look it up.

KR,

Steffen

[joscha_tilgner]

Hi brahms86 ,

If I count the fields than this doesn't work because on the database they are not in the same order like in the transaction.In the TMODF/TMODU I can only find the position of the fields itself.

The two fields vom T004F have both a length of 50 but in the TMODF/TMODU some fields reference to a position >100 so this doesn't work either...

BR Joscha

[brahms86]

Hello Joscha,

just clarify: By "transaction to display any particular filed status group" I meant transaction OBC4, not a user transaction.

But if you do not want to perform the counting for a particular field or would like to query several or varying fields, then I would suggest

to use FM FIELD_STATUS_CHECK. Just provide company code, account number, parameter I_SEI I would set to " " (blank) and the field name (like e.g. KOSTL or PERNR, whatever is applicable in your case). As a result you get the field status for that field.

Hope this solves your problem,

KR,

Steffen

[joscha_tilgner]

Hi brahms86 ,

but if I count the order from the OBC4 and interpret the fields accordingly it doesn't match. There has to be a transformation between the database entries and the OBC4 transaction:

Database Entry for first Field:

First Group:

Second Group:

So you can see that for the profit center part there should be 2 dots as an optional input but it is nowhere to be found.

BR joscha

[brahms86]

Hello Joscha,

but did you try the FM? That certainly does the trick.

And furthermore if you want to reproduce the logic you can copy its code.

KR,

Steffen