Issue in Indicator field for indirect valauation

[Former Member]

Hi,

I have a query on indirect valuation filed indicator in basic pay infotype ( IT 0008). Can anyone please explain me the use of indiect valuation filed in IT 0008.

Also, I am facing an issue while handling one of the case is that for Monthly salary (which has been indirectly valuated on the basis of SUMME Module), the indirect valuation indicator is not getting checked.

I have checked in table t539j, & in that this monthly salary wage type is based on 10p0 wage type (10p0 wage type is valuated on the basis of ANSAL). What is ANSAL module?

So, while entering the amount in IT 0008 against WT 10p0, the amount is automatically coming in monthly salary WT but that indicator is not getting checked.

Can anyone kindly help me on this issue

Regrads,

Priyanka Khanna

[Former Member]

Hi Priyanka,

welcome to SAP world......

ANSAL - Annual Salary

SUMME - Total Evaluation using table T539J

INVAL - Indirect Evaluation (India)

PRZNT - Percentage Evaluataion using table T539J

For IT 0008 - Basic pay you can enter manually amount for your wage types or it is automatic valuation on basis of another wage type.

for example: HRA amount is 50% of Basic

for this you have to configure the customization back end and while creating the IT 0008, when you give your HRA wage type amount automatically 50% of Basic will come.

for wage type HRA:

Table : V_T511 - wage type characteristics

Indirect eval. module : INVAL

Module variant: B

Table T539J:

PRZNT HRA wt start date end date Basic wt 50.00

if you give more information about your issue, then i will help regarding the issue

Best Regards.

[Former Member]

Hi Praneeth,

Thanku for a quick response.

Regarding my query, i am handling a case where, the WT 1000 is calculated based on another WT 10p0, so when i am putting the amount under WT10P0, the amount is automatically coming under WT 1000 but i don't don't know why the field for indirect valuation indicator is not getting checked for WT 1000 since WT 1000 is calculated indirectly based on SUMME model.

Please help me on this.

Regards,

Priyanka khanna

[Former Member]

Hi,

see wt 1000 is 100% of wt 10p0 in T539J.

if you don't want to WT 10p0 amount in WT 1000 go to T511 and change Module variant: A and system will not default the WT 10p0 amount, you can give amount manually.

if you specify your business scenario is helpful to me and some screen shots

Best Regards.

[Former Member]

Hi,

I do require WT 10p0 but my concern is of what reason the indirect valuation filed indicator is empty for WT 1000.

Do you have any idea behid indirect valuation field indicator.

Actually i am preparing one test scenario for the technical consultant.

In that while entering the amount in WT 10P0, the amount is coming in WT 1000 which is required for my case but the moment i save the data, the indirect valuation filed becomes empty agaist WT 1000.

Can you tell me why it is happening.

Regards,

Priyanka

[Former Member]

Hi,

please share the screen shot of your T511 and T539J.

For indirect valuation check these may help you.

Indirect Evaluation (INVAL) and 40ECS Feature - Payroll India (PY-IN) - SAP Library

Regards,

praneeth kumar

[Former Member]

Hi Praneeth,

Thanks for your quick respose & help.

Will check the links shared by you & will revert back if stil i am held up in the issue