All WTs in IT0008 were calculated double because of split payroll period

[Former Member]

Hi Friends,

I have an issue about integration between PT and PY;

As we know IT0007 can split payroll period;

In our company, WSRs in It0007 maybe change 2 times or more in a payroll period, SAP split period to 2 or more  section and below Pic. is it's reason:

All WTs in IT0008 were calculated double:

what should i fix this issue?

I appreciate your help in advance.

Best Regards,

Leila

[Sanky · Accepted solution]

Hi,

You can call the below PCR just after .

ZSPL

3

   1000

            ELIMI *

            ADDWT *

   1110

           ELIMI *

           ADDWT *

Use this PCR with PIT function. Insert this PCR just after line where 1st spliting is generating. Probably after X010 pcr in XT00 subschema. Check for your case.

Regards, Sankarsan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Sankarsan,

thanks for reply.

I have problem just with 0007 splits, as per my understand this solution is for all ITs right?

Best Regards,

Leila

[Sanky · Accepted solution]

Hi Leila,

Yes it will be for all other 4infotypes spliting also in WPBP table.

You can do this way to avoid the split in the IT7.

You will maintain the dummy WSR in IT7 and employees DWS will be maintained in the IT2003 based upon the day's and as well as the substitution type.

In this way you can handle the slpit issue as well as for OT or any other things related to positive time managment scenarion could be handle it easily.

Think once again for proper design.

Regards, Sankarsan

[Sanky · Accepted solution]

Hi Leila,

Have you checked?

Regards, Sankarsan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Sankarsan,

I thought about it but we are using  IT2003, in the temporary cases, I think that it's not solution for my issue.

Best Regards,

Leila

[Sanky · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Then you should convince the customer or else check that could be possible to copy WPBP function to z copy and modify according to requirement.

Regards,Sankarsan

[Former Member]

Hi,

Thanks a lot for answers.

Now I'm using custom PCR instead of XVAL, I've realized it's mistakes by your answers.

I'll try fix it.

Best Regards,

Leila

[Sanky]

Hi,

With the help of pcr XVAL, it's doing valuation of wage type based on PC10 and /8 series wage type value.

Where /8,series wage type generation is depend upon the employees present days, calendar days,working days, paid absences , unpaid absences etc. Now this factoring is calculating on wage type splitting which is done by function WPBP.

The step follows in the payroll schema,

WPBP-> Series /8 wage type through GEN /8->Pcr XVAL

that means you are trying to fix on 3rd   step in the process so how you will identify that splits are generated because of IT7 split.

Please rethink once again and share your final solution.

Regards,,Sankarsan  

[venkateshorusu]

Standard SAP is used splits concept to bring the actual amounts with accuracy, Now the question what problem you are facing when splits are there in the system.

Since SAP is adopted method of splits to calculate the actual amounts based on planned salary, as far as i understand it works once we assign processing class 10 with specification.

When we use ELIMI it eliminates the splits and cumulates with double amount Elaborate it with a problem what you are facing accordingly we can find out a solution.

With out knowing the exact problem, if you say splits are coming "No issues with that it absolutely works fine with the help of factoring.

Regards

Venkatesh

[sikindar_a]

Hi

What are the final results in RT ?

What in case if you have splits in other infotypes like 0008

Ex : If salary increased in mid of month ?

[jrg_wulf]

Hi Leila,

make sure that your WTs have the correct settings in PC10. In PCR XVAL, all WT will then be rated proportionally to the respective partial month factor (E.G. /801).

What Sankarsan suggested would clear the split-Information, but as result would double the amount.

I doubt, that is what you want.

The WPBP-splits have their merits and you're well advised to make yourself aquainted with partial month factoring, to handle it correctly.

Best regards - Jörg

[former_member193210]

On a general note, you should always mention thie Country code for a Payroll problem since  some Payroll elements are Country specific.

On the subject of the problem you face, as mentioned by Jörg, you should check the value of Processing Class 10 for all IT0008 WageTypes.

Next, if you execute a Simulation for one employee with the "Display log" box checked, drill down into the log to look at Function PARTT, then at Function GEN/8 and the PCRs that follow it.