on 05-11-2013 5:52 PM
Our sales order BOMs are extensive and have details till 6 to 8 levels. The first two or three levels in the Sales Order BOM are configurable materials (KMATs). We have to represent these products (sold on sales orders) as technical objects so that we can
We have a batch program that creates and updates an equipment record for the product/material being sold on the sales order. To create the structure under this equipment (based on the sales order BOM), we explored at the following options:
With this design, we will only be replace components at the equipment BOM level and not at the lower levels which are represented as material BOMs.
Please suggest the better option among the above ones.
Have you explored the option of having Construction type assigned to equipment??
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Maheswaran,
Thanks for the suggestion. We can enter a material number in the CONSTRUCTION TYPE field - which could have its own material BOM -- which would again be generic for all equipments -- and hence we will not be able to replace specific parts for one particular equipment structure.
(Modifying the material BOM of the material in the CONSTRUCTION TYPE would reflect in the structure of all equipments which is what we want to avoid. We want to update only those equipments where the component was actually replaced).
Thanks
Shashi
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.