SAP for Public Sector Discussions
Foster conversations about citizen engagement, resource optimization, and service delivery improvements in the public sector using SAP.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Inconsistencies with commitment carryforward and reversing (FMJ2/FMJ3)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello dear

I execute the commitment carryforward 2016-2017 with tx code FMJ2, this process took too long and I had to cancel it, then I run the reversing commitment carryforward with FMJ3, but the system shows me many inconsistencies, can you tell me what tx code or program can help me to fix this?

Thanks un advance, best regards

4 REPLIES 4

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ricardo,

I'm afraid the actions you undertook created a mess. Carry-forward should never be interrupted. You have a possibility of running this process with parallel process (up to 9) and, thus, improve significantly the performance. Now, speaking of your case... What type of inconsistencies do you speak about? Please, give me an example and I'll suggest a solution.

Regards,

Eli

rascencio
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Hi Eli thanks for replying, the commitment carryforward created documents in the used this year, when I ran the reverse, cleared most of the created documents, however not all, some continue to affect the used and available of this year. Thanks in advance, regards.

mar_novalbos
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

Hello Ricardo


Are you using Standard CCF or Chain CCF?

thanks, regards
Mar

rascencio
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Hello Mar thanks for responding, I commented as resolved if someone comes to require, running the FMJ3 and a couple of reports RFFMCCFR and RFFMCCFR_CHAIN attached file of SAP on wish I based, thanks and best regards.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxhFwSh6ZIJYS0VHeU4weDhHd00