User Exit/BADI to change Partner of quality notification

[Former Member]

Hello Gurus,

I have a requirement to change the Partner of quality notification when the notification is saved.

In the save IF_EX_NOTIF_EVENT_SAVE~CHANGE_DATA_AT_SAVE, there is no partner information in the interface.

Do you know the solution to cover this?

The fact is, when the user is recording defect via inspection lot and save a notification, the vendor is copied to notification partner but this vendor is not correct in my case and i need to modify it via some rules, could you give me some suggestion?

regards.

Charlie

[former_member339732]

You can check also user exit QQMA0014 - QM/PM/SM: Checks before saving a notification

[Former Member]

You can check exit  initially QQMA0019 - QM/PM/SM: Default Partner when Creating a Notification

[Former Member]

Hello Sujit,

I checked this exit before, I set a break point in it and record defect, when save the defect, the break point is not reached. i guess, this exit is only available when create notifiication like QM01. But for defect recording, it is not working...

regards,

Charlie

[Former Member]

User Exit:

QQMA0014  QM/PM/SM: Checks before saving a notification

[Former Member]

Hi Maheswaran,

<<QQMA0014  QM/PM/SM: Checks before saving a notification>>  dont have a partner information interface.

I dont think it will work for partner information change.

regards,

Charlie

[Former Member]

As per documentation from SMOD for this exit, it can be used for mandatory partner check. So I feel, it may work out.

Have you tried this exit??

[Former Member]

Hello Maheswaran,

thanks for the reply.

I checked the document, it says the exit "takes place after the mandatory partner check", but not "can be used for the mandatory partner check".

As i said, this exit function dont provide a interface with partner data, there's no way i can try it out.

Do you have other suggestion?

regards,

Charlie

[Former Member]

I am having same issue, need to get updated partner before save. Could you please share what was the resolution for above issue?