Storage Bin in LAGP not showing up in LX03?

[former_member604993]

Hi,

I have an issue.  We are using WM and obviously have storage bins set up.  There is one storage bin that does not show in LX03, and in some other transactions it is not visible in pull down menu's like LS11.   We can see this bin in LS02N, and in table LAGP.   The bin is not blocked (not for stock removal, not for putaway and not for inventory).  In LS02N, the bin shows it has 1 Quant, but does not list what material it is.  The bin should be empty!  The bin appears to have 100% capacity available, so not sure how it can show 1 quant.  The storage bin is not assigned to any materials in MLGN. There are no open transfer orders for this bin.  I am at a loss as to what to look for next to see why this bin isn't showing up in common reports even though it exists.  When I use transactions such as LX03 - I only select by Warehouse #, and no other criteria.  I also search in LX03 by Warehouse #, Storage type and do not see the bin.  Has anybody ran into this situation or can point in any direction as to why this might be happening?

Thanks!!

Karen

[former_member604993 · Accepted solution]

The storage bin does show up in L_LAGP.

The storage bin does NOT show up in LX02.

I know the material number so I looked in LQUA and couldn't find the cooresponding  quant. 

[former_member604993 · Accepted solution]

I also compared   LAGP to LX03 and this bin is the only difference between the two of them.

[JL23 · Accepted solution]

you initially said: " In LS02N, the bin shows it has 1 Quant, but does not list what material it is. "

Because of that I said you shall check in LQUA to find the material number, but I did not assume that you know the material number to use it to check LQUA.

Instead you should have used the bin number only to retrieve all LQUA records. These findings could then eventually help to find the root cause.

I guess you need to contact an ABAPer to have the logic debugged, to find when the record from L_LAGP is skipped from beeing displayed

[former_member604993 · Accepted solution]

As it turns out the code is looking at lagp-kzler and finding it blank, if it was an 'x', that would mean the bin is empty.  So the report thinks there will be an LQUA based on this wrong flag setting, so it would have used the LQUA record(s) to add a line to the report.  If KZLER flag had been an 'X', the report would have just added the LAGP record to the report with a designation of <empty>.

Program RLS10100 will show the bins where the "quant count" LAGP-ANZQU is not the real count of the quants, but it doesn't update it to the correct count.

Another program called RLTREORG2 - Storage Bins / Storage Units analysis - looked like it might help also, but it  did not help restore our inconsistency.

We ended up having a programmer change LAGP_KZLER to an "X" to signify it was indeed "empty", and that fixed the problem, since we could not replicate it in any of our test systems and had no idea what exactly caused the inconsistency.

[former_member563943 · Accepted solution]

This message was moderated.

[JL23]

check if you display the result with a variant where this bin is excluded

e.g. execute LX03 then chose from menu EDIT > Delete filter

[former_member604993]

I tried what was selected but that bin still did not show up.  All filters are deleted. 

I can see all the storage bins around this bin, but this particular bin still isn't showing up.    Have you ever saw where a Quant got stuck in a storage bin, as this is what appears to be happening?  Not sure why.

[JL23]

I have seen a lot in the last 16 years with SAP, 90% of my support work is caused by errors created from own developments

Usually I would say LX03 will show what you selected.

the same does the pull down display for storage bins in LS11.

This would in general mean that your bin may not be created in the storage type you entered there.

If you are certain you entered the right values, then we have to check in more detail. LS11 for example uses the view L_LAGP to display bins.

L_LAGP does not have many fields, can be please check L_LAGP in SE16 if you can see your bin.

And if not, then compare the content of L_LAGP fields of other bins with your bin and see where the difference is.

I dont think that the quant itself has anything to do with the display of the bin in this overviews.

Do you see the bin and the quant in LX02?

if you do not know the material of the quant, then use SE16 and look into table LQUA.