Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Transfer between assets with different number of depreciation areas

Hello experts,

we have an issue with our client.

We have 2 types of AuC: the first one (let's say AUC_1) has only 2 depreciation areas (10 / 90) and the second one (AUC_2) has 3 (10 / 90 / 91).

A user created an AuC using AUC_1, instead of AUC_2.

We tried to transfer the costs using ABUMN but the area 91 does not get populated (we can see a movement but with 0 value).

We checked the customizing and area 91 should be derived from 90.

Do you have any idea how to populate the 91 depreciation area?

Regards,

Thibault

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

4 Answers

  • Jan 05, 2017 at 06:56 AM

    Hi,

    If you want to add the dep.area for particular asset/s, in that case you have to reverse the transaction posted for the asset, create a new asset with correct dep.areas and post the transaction for the new asset.

    Regards,

    Mukthar

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Jan 05, 2017 at 01:03 PM

    Hi,

    If the sending asset (A) has 2 areas and the receiving asset (B) has 3 areas, you should take a transfervariant with transfermethod 4.

    (Don't distinguish transfervariant and transfermethod).


    The system checks the following:

    If you have the depreciation area on the sending asset, the system takes the values from this area.

    If you have the depreciation area not on the sending asset, the system takes the values from this area where you have maintained the "Adoption values" from depreciation area (in the tr. OABC).

    (Note 327088)

    best regards

    Bernhard

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Jan 09, 2017 at 09:45 AM

    Thank you for your feedbacks. We successfully applied the method suggested by Bernhard.

    Regards,

    Thibault

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Jan 09, 2017 at 01:20 PM

    Thank you for the feedback :-)

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded