cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

File repositories over WAN links, VERY slow!

Former Member
0 Kudos

We are trying to use KM to create a uniform access to our network shares over the internet. The shares work. The files on servers on the same subnet of the portal show up within a few seconds. But, when accessing files that are across a WAN link, a full T-1, it will take 3 or more minutes for the listing to show. The same happens when you start to drill down in the directories.

Could it be possible that it is downloading every file in that repository in a temp file before it is sent to the client? I check network activity when the request is made and there is traffic between the portal and the file server on the other side of the WAN. All I want to do is browse the directory, it shouldn't take that long just to browse.

Has anyone else do repositories over WAN links? I am using W2KSecurityManager as well, and yes, permissions work fine.

Any insight would be appreciated.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

David,

Perhaps, you should use other kind of repository, for example: WebDAV o Web.

Patricio.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Correct me if I am wrong (a am wrong a lot) but, WebDav only works with Microsoft base products?

Former Member
0 Kudos

No.

WebDAV stands for "Web-based Distributed Authoring and Versioning". It is a set of extensions to the HTTP protocol which allows users to collaboratively edit and manage files on remote web servers.

Patricio

Former Member
0 Kudos

I will try to make a WebDAV repository out of one on Monday.

I just tried something different though. I logged on as a user with administrator rights, it only took 13 seconds to list the directory instead of 3 minutes plus. The regular user has rights and eventually sees what they should, it is just painfully slow.

Former Member
0 Kudos

That would indicate that it's caused by the ACL manager (what happens if you disable it...?).

Former Member
0 Kudos

My ACL manager is not set.

I am using W2KSecurityManager. I was under the impression that if I use this, I am not to set an ACL manager up.

Unless this is not the case, what one would I use?