Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

wrong assignment of a NWA to NW Header

Good Afternoon Gurus,

Network activity 111111-A is worngly assigned to network 111111, actuclly activity should belong to network 222222.

Network activity 111111-A has actucal cost.

Will the wrong assignment of a NWA to NW Header affect anything in the project

Is there any functionality difference when an NWA is assigned to a particular NW Header or is the purpose of the header purely related to how NWAs are grouped?

Please throw light on this issue

I hope only data in reporting will vary

Thanks

MM

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

4 Answers

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 16, 2012 at 08:14 AM

    Hi Menaka,

    Yes, you are correct. I don't see any adverse impact. Only the data in reporting will vary. If you are ok with that let it be as it is. Else, reverse the actual postings and create the activity under the correct network header.

    Regards,

    Gokul

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Oct 16, 2012 at 08:35 AM

    Not sure but logically you can move via drag and drop method NWA to where you want to assign under any WBS if you are using multiple NW header then no.

    because commitment with activity it be.

    Regards,

    Sanjeev

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Former Member

      Hi,

      I also tried to darg and drop actvity from Network A to Network B and I do got same mesage  as below

      Moving Activities to Network Headers Not Supported

      Message no. CNPB015

      Later I tried to drop the activity to the WBS (say WBS B) of the Network B and it got assigned to WBS B but Network Assignment still remains to Network A only..so I guess as suggested by Gokul, rework seems the only option.

  • Oct 16, 2012 at 09:32 AM

    Dear Menaka,

    I have checked on my system but this is not allowing any drag and drop to different network but can allow within same network.

    When you have actual cost occurred via any means this will not allow according to me and follow the same as suggested by Gokul (reverse the actual postings and create the activity under the correct network header.).

    thanks

    Sunil

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • you are right sunil i'm agree with you, but means of my earliest post as commitment with activity can move under any wbss not with actual cost i said not sure but logically it must be...

      Regards,

      Sanjeev

  • Oct 23, 2012 at 01:56 PM

    Dear Menaka,

    as Gokul said, if you can live with the incorrect assignment, and let it be. After the actual costs were posted, it is not possible to move it or delete it. You can do a settlement of the costs of this activity to a new activity, but the settled costs may have different meaning of the direct posted costs.

    Kind regards,

    Zhenbo

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded