cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Talent Monitor - EHP6

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

The Talent Monitor is showing incorrect nominations in the Talent Review meeting. For example, In the below snapshot the employee with no assessment document is also nominated.

I am using the standard configuration for Talent Monitor with search depth as 1. The settings are same for both S_PERFORMANCE as well as S_POTENTIAL fields.

How does Talent monitor fetch the values? I am bit confused in understanding the above selection criteria as well.

Additionally, am NOT using SUPPORT_UNAPPRAISED_TALENTS parameter in the Talent review meeting.

Thanks,
Sachin

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

lukemarson
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sachin,

The Talent Monitor displays all employees that are assigned to the managers/OrgUnits assigned in the Planning tab and also match the filter applied to the Talent Monitor. What filter do you have on the Talent Monitor?

Best regards,

Luke

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Luke,

I have applied the filter "Performance and Potential (All Values)" to the Talent Monitor. The search configuration is as mentioned above. Can you pelase explain how does the selection criteria work in the search configuration? The help document is bit confusing.

Thanks,
Sachin

lukemarson
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sachin,

To me it looks like a possible bug. The filter should only return individuals that have both performance and potential values. Those without it can be added to a TRM, but not from the Talent Monitor. I suggest you raise an OSS because there are lots of bugs with TRM in EhP6. This might also be a TREX search issue, related to using more than one search criteria.

Please let us know a solution if you get one.

Best regards,

Luke

lukemarson
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sachin,

Is your issue resolved? If so please mark the discussion as answered and provide the resolution. This way the community can benefit from knowing the solution.

Best regards,

Luke

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Luke,

The issue is still there. I will post the solution once its resolved.

Thanks,
Sachin