STOP: No rule in key IN722*****

[Former Member]

Dear Experts,

well there aren't more threads on this error on SCN , hence not able to find the solution ,

I have attached the payroll error log experts , kindly help me find the solution for the same .. plzzzz

Thank you

Arun

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Experts,

The Problem is solved..

Well i think the error it self gave the hint as to where was the problem ..  No rule in key IN72 2

so i chkd the  PCR for IN72 if there is a rule missing for  ESG 2 , n it did,  there wasn't ne rule for ESG 2 ..

so i copy pasted the rule of ESG 3 and and used for ESG 2.

after i ran payrolll , the error came for IN77 2 , again i use the same logic, after this the error came for INRM, i used the same logic. finally it was successfull..

However i thank all the experts Mr RITZ, Mr. Venkata and Mr . Srinu for giving  support for my issue..

[Former Member]

Dear Expersts ,

The problem still persists , request you to kindly help me out in this issue.

if it has anything to do with absense valuation then plz let me know as i havent done any configuration on the same as yet ..

Regards

Arun

[Former Member]

Dear Arun,

This prevents process if IT is not cleared at the end of the payroll process.

This can be cleared, if you put your Payroll status upto the current payroll period.

and re run the payroll.

It will be resolved.

IT should be empty.

Thanks n all the best.

[Former Member]

Thank you Srinu,

May i know if you are talking bout Income tax , if yes then can  u xplain a liiite more in detail on waht i shud be doing

Regards

Arun

[Former Member]

Dear Arun,

May i know which specification you have maintained in PCL20 for a wage type.

and maintain PCL 72 as 1 as applicable, if it is empty for any such wage type, which you are making the cumulations, system trigger you the error.

Thank you.

[Former Member]

Thank you Srinu ,

The PCL 20 for /001 WT is 5

[Former Member]

Hi

The payroll is processing from 2007? Can you recheck again.

Best Regards

Venkata Manikanth

[Former Member]

Thank you Mr .Manikath

Well i dont know how is dat happening.. i am running for current period by all means..

can you suggest where could i have gone wrong

Regards

Arun

[Former Member]

Hi Arun

Check the Control record and see what is the period it is showing and change it to you req pay period

If above is correctly mentioned then go to Ee IT0003 and change the earliest master data changes to be leave blank either you can try from PU03 trxn code also

Accounted to field in IT0003 indicated that the till date the paroll was processed.

Best Regards

Venkata Manikanth

[Former Member]

Thank you Mr.Venkata,

I did as you suggested , i mean cleared all the dates form the 0003 screen , except accounted to field , besides the date in "account to" field is 31.10.2006 .on the other hand  the EE hire date is 02.05.2007.

plz help ..

Regards

Arun

[Former Member]

Hi Arun

Thanks for the update

Accounted to field is 31.10.2006 it means the Ee payroll was processed till oct 2006 only,

So click on PC00_m40_clstr and enter the emp id and see the Rt tables are available from 2006 if not then someone has updated this field with wrong info.

Either you can clear it if there is no real py was processed.

Best Regards

Venkata Manikanth

[Former Member]

Thank you Mr Venkata

well i think the pay results exist from 02.05.2007 ..

for reference i have attached the screen shot of payresults

[Former Member]

Hi Arun

Thanks for sharing the screen dumps.

The accounted to field generally get updated whenever you have processed the payroll run by the system,

I was little surprise that when the Ee is having the result, but it was not showing the right details in the accounted to field , I guess it was modified by someone.

So either you can maintain the last payresult period into that field and clear the

Earliest MD change & Mast.data chng.bonus fields.

Best Regards

Venkata Manikanth

[Former Member]

Thank you for speedy response,

i did change the accounted to field to  last payroll run date..  and cleared rest all dates . but the error still persistes.

besides tell me if it has got ne thng to do with PDC field , it has the same hire date ..

Regards

Arun

[Former Member]

Dear Anuj,

Remove all dates and keep blank only Accounted up to field only.

Thank you.

[Former Member]

Thank you Srinu ,

Did as you said .. deleted all dates and kept accounted date to current date required..

error still persisits .. besides i did not get on the suggestion you gave for PCL 72 , dat i have to change for.

did u mean dat i have to give "1" for PCL 72  for all applicable WT for my client or  did you mean i should   use "1"   to which ever WT it is  applicable , plz calrify on this..

regards

Arun

[Former Member]

Hi

Can you check the Processing Class 72 of WT /001 in table V_512W_D.

It should be blank : Pass on no change.

[Former Member]

Thank you Mr.Lad

Well the PC of /001 is blank , but it isnt "Pass on no change".  however , there is 0 - Pass on uncahged , i tried wid this as well , the error still persists..  

plz help further