on 09-24-2012 4:25 PM
Hi,
this is proxy-->soap Async scenario and i have 'Integrated Configuration' in Directory and this is on 7.3 dual stack. i know there are lots of threads on this error. but nothing helped me. can somebody help in resolving this?
i have this error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!--
Receiver Determination
-->
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I I see this thread: http://scn.sap.com/thread/3181937 is there any SAP note regarding this? Just wanted to make sure this change doesn't affect other things major.
Hey Prema, the problem might be that your message is being sent to the Integration Engine, not towards the Advanced Adapter Engine. You need to create the configuration in SXMSIF and SXMB_ADM.
You can find the whole description in this document:
Check section "4.1 Configurations in the Sender ABAP System."
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I tried with "receiver determination" instead of "integrated configuration"; it works like charm.. any settings i should take care when doing with integrated configuration? thank u all for your help.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Prema,
You can not use Integrated configuration ,Since the Integration Server does not participate in the processing of messages, any functions provided only on the Integration Server are not available for local message processing.
The following functions are not available when using local processing in the AAE:
Adapters: IDoc, HTTP
Mapping: ABAP
ccBPM
Proxy
Regards
Hari.
you are so right Aerv. thanks so much for your coerce on the settings..
Sender/Reciver ID of that proxy in sxmb_admin was pointing to wrong system(prod); now is changed to point to correct system(sanbox) in ECC system.
whenever ECC integration do not find right Sender/Receiver ID then it just send the message to IE of PI from ECC system.
the document you shared is very useful one. thanks. in that document it says to make it as "*" but we changed to point to perticular system.
this resolved our issue.
Hi Prema,
I faced same error "NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC" . In my case i used wrong communication component. Please check you are using correct sender business system .
Regards
Hari.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Prema: Could you check if the error is on the Original message or on the response? Also, can you check if the target system is raising an exception?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Feroz, it is stuck at the 2nd step "Receiver Determination". it comes in PI 1st step "Inbound Message" i see the payload;
as this is Async message; there is no response. its proxy to file. its not reaching partner system yet.
and i don't understand why this error is showed in sxmb_moni (IE) not in AAE? as this is proxy and is soap.
Please check the following. Do you specify the receiver business component, target service interface and namespace accordingly without any error in the integrated configuration object? Do you have multiple operation in the service interface?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The problem looks with receiver determiantion like the condition written in RD not satisfied . i am not sure how PI 7.3 Configurtaion works(like no need to create RD/ID??).
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Prema,
At first you should say to the community what you have tried and the people could avoid to repeat a possible solution that you already have tried.
I have a question, are you sharing the communication channel in several scenarios?
Regards.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
83 | |
24 | |
12 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.