on 06-29-2012 4:44 PM
Clint using:
Plastic: America,Europe, Asia
Chemical: America,Europe, Asia
Liquid : America,Europe, Asia
Want change :
America : Plastic,Chemical, Liquid
Europe: Plastic,Chemical, Liquid
Liquid: Plastic,Chemical, Liquid
What will be reporting Impact. What way i should change. PLEASE help me ASAP....
Hi Divyesh,
obviously, the company wants to change the view entirely.
I would check (cc = cost centre, PC = profit centre):
1 assignement of cc to pc => you might have to change that also.
2 allocation cycles => are the cost receivers the same still
3 cc sets used in reporting => you might have to regroup (match with new reports now need
as the view changed)
4 transaction in new environment => e.g. automatic account assignment (OKB9) =>
do you still post to the correct cc
5 Do you simply reassign (then just shift in OKEON or do you also have to renumber
your cc (often the case) according to the new hierarchy?
6 Do you have to change substitutions?
7 The change you describe also let's us look to the revenue side (also refer to 1).
=> one further aspect my be a costing based CO-PA which allows for a reporting
often without major changes as normally revenues would be registered according
to area (America/Europe, Asia) and product group (plastic, chemical, liquid).
I assume that in your target structure you meant Asia instead of Liquid though.
=> Some customers also want to see a PC-balance (also refer to 1).
Then the changes you envision can be called major ones.
8 Define a cut-over from which on the assignment is valid (at best month-end).
I hope it helps (and that you evaluate...-)
With kind regards
Thomas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
Maybe you could do it as follows:
CO Area America CO Area Europe CO Area Asia
-CC Grp Plastic -CC Grp Plastic -CC Grp Plastic
-CC Grp Chemical -CC Grp Chemical -CC Grp Chemical
-CC Grp Liquid -CC Grp Liquid -CC Grp Liquid
I hope that I have understood your request.
Kind regards
Manette
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Dvyesh,
Technically I don't see any impact. From reporting perspective, business can report cost center data as per new hierarchical structure.
You need to re-assign the hierarchical group in cost center in case there are no further groups down to America/Europe/Asia. Otherwise just re-arrange the groups using KSH2
Pramod
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Technically you can have a straight flat structure in OKEON (one group and all CC in this group). That's a system requirement that you have to have all your cost centers in standard hierarchy - to keep things under control.
From reporting point of view you can have as much grouping as you want. Business people would create themselves the grouping they would need.
Cheers
J
User | Count |
---|---|
100 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.