on 06-12-2012 8:36 PM
Hi Friends,
Our client is in the process of enhancing current demand planning functionality,
In the current business process, all the planning books and Data Views are maintained with the following manner
Time Bucket Profile ID (Future):18 Months
Time Bucket Profile ID (Past):24 Months
Whereas now they would like to go ahead
Time Bucket Profile ID (Future):24 Months
Time Bucket Profile ID (Past):24 OR 36 OR 48 Months???
Here the point, If they go ahead with 48 months past historical data, is the system performance will be at great problem?
Please suggest with your valuable inputs?
Thanks
Sai Dacha
Hi Friends,
Please confirm the below points.
1) System Performance is mainly based on Time Series Horizon
2) Time Bucket Profile does'nt impact the system performance.
Kindly let me know.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Sai Dacha
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
To my understanding, the system performance heavily depends on the CVC. TB profile influences only the display. With considerable CVC breadth and depth and storage bucket profile of the planning area consists of monthly buckets, the specified TB profiles may not drastically impact the performance.
Thus, the factors that influence the system performance are (in descending order of importance)
1. Number of CVC
2. Technical time periods of your storage bucket profile
3. Data granularity, aggregation, and disaggregation
4. Data view settings and macros associated with the events
Thanks,
Rajesh
User | Count |
---|---|
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.