Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

COPA update billing condition based on statistical or real

Hi all,

We have an complex business structure with lot many company codes falling under different business segment.

We have multiple sales condition procedure. An manual condition ZN99 exist that will over ride all price calculated by system. Whenever ZN99 is in use other condition becomes inactive and only ZN99 is updated in COPA.

Recently an Business group came up with requirement that difference between ZN99 and ZA01(system price determination) should goto to Discount ZD01. Based on above SD guy made ZN99 as statistical for that pricing procedure applicable to some company cod. Business is able to see the effect they want.

But it screwed COPA as ZN99 and ZA01 is mapped to ERLOS, revenues are booked twice.

Need your assistance to find a way to resolve this. COPA should not get updated when ZN00 is statistical. Please i cannot remove any mapping as it is widely in other business that are well settled. One solution i think is to use new condition instead of ZN00 andthat should not be mapped in COPA.

Regards,

Atul

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

1 Answer

  • Posted on Jun 12, 2012 at 08:28 AM

    Hi Atul

    You said you want ZN99 in COPA for sure.. So its gonna be there

    Then ZA01 if you want in COPA - you should use a separate Val Field and not ERLOS... Else, it will double up.. You must ensure that both values are parked in Separate Val fields in COPA so that you can calculate the diff during reporting...

    Or you can simply update ZD01 (Calculate ZD01 in SD Pricing Procedure) in COPA in the discount val field

    br, Ajay M

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Ajay Maheshwari

      Thanks Ajaybhai,

      I am not afraid of mapping it with other value field but it will impact reporting from BI and will raise issue on standardisation considering the volume and complexity.

      I have informed SD not to use ZN00 for their new scenario but to create an new condition similar to ZN99. I will not map it COPA and so in given scenario only ZA01 and ZD01 will move to COPA.

      Regards,
      Atul

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.