Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Budget duplication under consumed Budget-PR-RFQ-Contract-PO

Dear Experts,

We have Fund Management Configured in the system and all the process are working fine.

But in case, where a Contract is created from MM side after PR, at the time of PO the consumed Budget is Doubled.

For Example:-

Normal Scenario-

PR - Rs1000

PO - Rs1000

GR - Rs1000

IR - Rs1000

The consumed Budget remains 1000.

Contract Scenario

PR - Rs1000

Contact - RS1000

PO - Rs1000

GR - Rs1000

IR - Rs1000

The consumed Budget doubles i.e. Rs2000 at the time of PO. and Contract is not updating in Val.Type Text.

We have done the configuration of Comp Code Group, assignment to Comp Code, Maintained Data for integration Scenario with Document Category as Reservation and 11 as document type. MM doc type is also created with CP Active.

Request you to please let me know in case I am missing any configuration.

Awaiting Your Response.



Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Assigned Tags

Related questions

1 Answer

  • Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM


    The flow with contracts should normally go like this (assuming that you set the integratnio):

    Contract creation - EMF of reservation tyre is generated - PR creation (linked to EMF) - PO creation (linked to PR).

    In this case, contract by generating EMF will consume budget, PR will consume EMF, PO will consume PR, etc. So, the budget consumption will remain on the same level as it was during contract creation. Please, check that you have this flow (business-wise), because if you create PR without linking it to EMF generated by contract, then obviously you'll have double consmuption: the first from PR and the second from the contract via EMF.



    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Eli Klovski

      Hello, we have the same business scenario as Ravindra, our flow is PR - Contract - PO. We have activated FM and our customer’s requirement is to check and commit budget at the earliest possible stage (PR).

      Furthermore, each PR item needs to commit budget for the current and/or following fiscal years (based on delivery dates). Budget commitments must also be adjusted and monitored in all subsequent stages (Contract, PO). Namely, the requirement is to have PR 100, Contract 80, PO1 20, PO2 30 (Total 50) etc.

      We are evaluating the use of the Commitment Plan in Contracts, but we discovered that commitment plan cannot reduce previous budget commitment from PR.

      We also evaluated the creation of an earmarked fund reservation instead of PR commitment (we set PR update in FM as statistical), but this reservation cannot be referenced in Commitment Plan either (although we have made the appropriate customizing so that commitment plan generates earmarked fund precommitments, still we cannot enter in Commitment Plan the reservations to be reduced by the generated precommitments).

      What would you advice in this case? Thanks in advance!


Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.