on 03-20-2012 4:30 PM
Dear Experts ,
Client raise one PO (GR-BASED IV) raised with one line item and this line item have two grids 1) blue colour 42 size and 2) red colour 42 size with 100 qty and 50 qty
Receiving goods 150 qty at first (100+50) time .After that , client cancel this document only first grid 100 qty and again receive the 100 qty same grid (first grid )
So Here totally 3 material document numbers 1) 5000000100 100qty 1 line item and 50 qty second line item 2) 560000100 cancel document only first line item i.e 100 qty 3) 500000101 again receive 100 qty first line item .
PO number 5200320101
Now client do the MIRO for second line item , there it posted successfully .And second time he do MIRO for first line ,
MIRO they enter PO number and system shows the first line item with 100 qty , But swhat happend is here system shows the reference document number as 5000000100 instead of 5000000101 .
Why system shows the first material document number in reference document . this document already cancelled .
Here Problem is , when do the MIRO , first material document number has not done UD decision and last document completed UD decision .
So in MIRO system only allowing the LIV after UD only . It's not possible to do first material document number UD .
HERE DELIVERY NOTE NUMBER ALSO SAME FOR ALL DOCUMNETS.
please provide solution further to do MIRO
Dear Ravindra,
As you are using UD, please kindly check if you implemented enhancement
QEVA0001 to do the stock-posting. If this is true : Does the issue also occur, if you
use the 'standard posting : to unrestricted' ? If you are using this enhancement, please
check the coding.
Regards,
ian Wong
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ravindra ,
Pls confirm the movement types used while MIGO.
one posiibility is that user is using 103 & 105 Movement type.
For Case I : User does the I/P of goods (100+50) using 103 &105 movement type
For Case II : User does the cancellation of only 105 movement type via 106
For Case III : User again does the MIGO via movement type 105.
In all 3 cases MIGO 103 Document number remains same which is correctly shown in MIRO document.
Honey
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
When it is GR based invoice verification , system will show the GR documents if happened in partial too during MIRO,However if the material is QM managed , check the inspection lot happened with the first document for the UD , if reversed means to say , the lot sould be free from result .Wwhat the lot taken for the second MIGO after reversal.
Try doing the MIro with reference to the material document and see the differance.
Regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
96 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.