typical scenario- <removed>

[Former Member]

Hi All,

I have a requirement-

we get damaged products into plant- and we do value addition to the damaged product and sent it as a finished product to the customers, also we dont want to valuate it at plabt level as its customer product. And to that finished product we consume some raw material on shop floor.

( as I recieve it as x-material code, and as I am doing some value addition to the same X-material( want to create a production order, can nn this case we maintain same material code?),

any explanation & suggestions on this? in SAP R/3

Some Consultants might have PP back ground,

regards

svrinsapscm

Moderator message: Prority normalized - Please use a better subject in your next threads Please read Rules of Engagement, and Asking Good Questions in the Forums to get Good Answers

Edited by: Jürgen L. on Feb 15, 2012 11:54 AM

[Former Member]

Hello,

If you dont want to use 2 material code for the damaged material and the final product which you send to the customer then you can check the following possibility.

You can use a valuated material for the same but you can receive the material from customer using a Free goods PO (Provided the material MAP managed) or you can receive the same against a PO with a Z - account assignment catg with GR Non-valuated indicator. Here you can create the BOM as well as Production Order for the same material.

Just compare the above solution with the one using 2 material codes (One for Customer damaged material and one for the FG).

Thanks & Regards,

[Former Member]

Hii,

Just maintain two material code for both (raw material and finished product- value added material)

thanks

Pushpa

[Former Member]

I hope you are not clear with the scenario

We get wornout( damaged/ used) produts from( Exp: X,y,Z , etc), into the plant. Now Plant will do refurbishing(value addition), and sent it bak to the customers.

now while doing value addition, we use raw material like-gum, other consumables etc.

Its like MTO scenario, but the worn out product which we get is not our product( so it has to be treadted as non valuated). at the same time- as our raw materials are being used in production- cost of those materials are to be captured against the production order.

I can say that for non valauted product we cannot create production order.

hope you now it much more clarity-

for the same: when we recieve the damaged product-( say- FG-1 as material number), now we cannot make production order for the same, we need to have it as diffrent Finished good material number- can we have two diffrent material code for the same product, if yes how it can be , or is there any where we can get that link or any suggestions

thanks

svr

[Former Member]

Hi,

You cannot have a two different material code for the same part number, instead you can different valuation based on their type with the help of split valuation function in sap.

Regards,

velu

[tejyadav]

Hi, This is a standard scenario known as Internal subcontracting, Where you have to raise the Sales order for the Finished product which you are sending to Customer,

The damaged material send by your customer will be maintained as Non valuated material in your system,

Based on SO, Production Order will be created by MRP or manually, BOM should have your RM & Consumables as well as the Non valuated damaged material send by your customer.

[kailas_ugale]

Hi,

We get wornout( damaged/ used) produts from( Exp: X,y,Z , etc), into the plant. Now Plant will do refurbishing(value addition), and sent it bak to the customers.

now while doing value addition, we use raw material like-gum, other consumables etc. 

Its like MTO scenario, but the worn out product which we get is not our product( so it has to be treadted as non valuated). at the same time- as our raw materials are being used in production- cost of those materials are to be captured against the production order.



I can say that for non valauted product we cannot create production order.

If material is non-valuated then how you expect vale addition for same.it wont effect any valuation

second material damage by you,you have to pay for that,then why you not showing other material as internal consumtion or excess consumption for same

Regards

Kailas Ugale