movement type 261/262

[Former Member]

Hi All,

Good issue to production using movement type 261 or 262 (Consumption for order from warehouse). Question is Can this transaction block the material to be issued if it is not in the BOM? If can not, is there a way to block the material to be issued if not part of the BOM.

Thanks.

[Former Member]

Let me give an example.

Product material 10005 has BOM material A, B, and C. Production Order 12345 is created for that material 10005. Material A is not configured as a backflush, where as B and C is backflush. I am focusing in material A. Material A is issued using MIGO, good issue, others with mv type 261. In the selection under Account Assignment, there is a field "Order" which is entered for the Production Order #. The problem is if the material A12 which is not part of the BOM is entered instead of material A, the system does not reject. It is the same if using mv type 262. This will cause an issue in the reporting. Is there a way to prevent the system not accept the wrong material that is not part of the BOM?

Thanks.

[JL23]

you have to use the exit EXIT_SAPMM07M_001 in enhancement MBCF0002 to control that

[Former Member]

Hello Edward,

Can you give more details?

As i know 261 is a movement type which is used for materials issued for work orders or production orders. system is doing 261 mov. acc. to BOM, while the upper material's production declaration is done into system (131). If the material is not belong to any BOM, automatic backflush can not be done by system, so you can not see 261 moevement in MB51.

Regards

Black

[tejyadav]

Hi, No it cannot block the material if is not in BOM,

If can not, is there a way to block the material to be issued if not part of the BOM.

You can block by creating reservation against the production order with MB21,

through MB21 -> Top menu Movement type ->Consumption -> For Order.

[sjeevan]

One solution would be, is to change the message M7 (application area) 362 (message number) in OMCQ to E (Error). But then the side effect would be you cannot over issue even for manual reservation (any reservation in general). Also if the users have authorization to change production order they can manually add a component and do the goods issue. So, this may not be a very feasible solution.

Other solution would be to implement the BAdI WORKORDER_GOODSMVT (TCode SE18) in that there are lot of methods you can implement the one which suits your case well.

[JL23]

in general you have to investigate if this movement is performed before the actual goods issue is made or after.

if after (I have never seen it differently), then I do not see much sense in blocking the goods issue as you block only the movement in sAP, but in production facitlity it had already happened.

The movement type itself decides whether it posts the consumption to planned or unplanned consumption.

if you want to restrict 261 from posting unplanned consumption (because you may have created an extra movement type for that) then you should make use of the user exit in material movements to check yourself if a reservation is available and to issue an error message if not.

[kunal_ingale]

Hi

for better rplys please post this issue to PP forum

now for this scenario you needd to configure automated goods issue while confirmation

[Goods Movements for Confirmation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/b1/c04d01439a11d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm]