comparison between R/3-ECCS & SEM BCS

[Former Member]

<b>Hi all,

We ve to compare thw two systems R/3 ECCS & SEM-BCS in detail as we are goin for consolidation i near future.

Could you all suggest some thing regarding this.

It will be very nice if you could suggest some parameters based on which these two are to be compared.

Regards,

Feddin.</b>

[former_member93896 · Accepted solution]

Feddin,

go to http://service.sap.com/sem > Media Library > Presentations > SEM-BCS. There's a PPT that explains the differences.

Regards,

Marc

SAP NetWeaver RIG

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks Marc,

I'm going through the documents.

Does make a lot of sense.

Regards,

Feddin.

[Former Member]

Thanx marc,

Well i ve one more doubt regdin parallel accountin.

Is there any limitation in ECCS that parallel accounting can be done only for two accounting standards compared to the n number status of BCS.

[Former Member]

Hi all...

I went through the articles but i couldnt get the advantage BCS is having due to the Matrix Organisation structure.

Also is there any limitation in ECCS that parallel accounting can be done only for two accounting standards compared to the n number status of BCS.

Regards,

Feddin

[former_member93896]

Feddin,

in EC-CS you have only one consolidation unit object. So if you are dealing with a matrix org then you have to compound for example company code and profit center into a CS unit object. This potenially creates a lot of units and therefore maintenance overhead.

With BCS you can keep the two dimensions separated and all combinations are valid (without the need to create them).

Regards

Marc

SAP NetWeaver RIG