cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MATP missing parts list

former_member566355
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,

I am getting the following messages in MATP missgin parts list for one material.

Standard Check and/or 1. Check Step

2. Check Step for Resolving Violation of Plan Validity

What are the above 2 steps ?

Regards,

RS

Edited by: sap_apo31 on Dec 16, 2011 12:52 PM

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Mrinal_K_Roy
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi RS,

Check your settings at check instruction which governs the sequence of check (Prod check , PAL or forecast) and validity mode for the missing part. It appears that the component of FG is missing considering the paramters set in check instruction.

Regards,

Mrinal

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

For first one this denotes check step within the multilevel ATP check, in which there are no completely confirmed components.

For the second message, please check the component for which you are getting the message, is it also IN-House produced? If so, check the validity of the corresponding plan (ppm/pds).

Regards

Rinju

former_member566355
Participant
0 Kudos

hi,

In line with the above query, I have another issue..

At the component level, stock of 100 kg is available, even then during MATP (sales order for parent material ) system is showing the component quantity as missing parts.

When I tried creating sales order directly for the component system is taking the stock into account during product availability check.

Is there something missing in configuration ?

Product check is 'on' in component check instruction. Let me know if further details required.

Regards,

RS

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

1. What is the quantity shown in the Missing Part List?

2. What is FG to component relation in the BoM?

3. For what qty you are trying to create SO at component level?

In general if component is visible in missnig part list then it means MATP considered it, so ATP settings should be fine.

Regards

Rinju

former_member566355
Participant
0 Kudos

hi,

Sorry, there was missing configuration for check mode. Problem is solved.

Regards,

RS