on 12-09-2011 11:34 AM
Hi,
User has created a Vendor for PO, but that was due to wrong Account Group. After that User delete the vendor and used another vendor during PO creation in mid process. Now Condition are coming wrongly from that.
I checked in PO header history, there Address Number is showing related of wrongly created Vendor...but Vendor code is not showing in LFA1 table against address number.
Now i have Address Number of Vendor but cann't find the vendor code.
I want to know the Vendor Code already deleted from system (because not showing in Vendor Master table LFA1).
Please guide..
Hi
User has created a Vendor for PO, but that was due to wrong Account Group. After that User delete the vendor and used another vendor during PO creation in mid process. Now Condition are coming wrongly from that.
If I am not wrong you want assign assign vendor schema group in vendor master record so you condition will come properly in PO
Open your vendor master record and select purchasing tab in XK02 and then assign suitable schema group there like for domestic purchasing or import purchasing
your condition will flow in PO
Regards
Kailas ugale
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
As per your comment "whenever we maintain address it makes a entry in ADRC Like for Plant,Storage location, customer master"...How to maintain the Address...which impact only table ADRC, not in LFA1.
We still not found the reason that Vendor Code was deleted or it was just maintained (as your commented)...
please guide...
HI,
For example when we maintain plant address in OX10
It creates a entry in ADRC ( but it does not mean you will get plant in LFA1 )
to get the plant address details go to T001W ->get ADRNR with this go to ADRC get the plant address details
Same as customer master ADRC does ensures LFA1 entry
Now can you specifically give the details where you get that ADRNR for which you are getting ADRC and not LFA1
I got that Address Number in PO Change History...after that i check vendor code against that address in LFA1 Table but not found... I again check in Table ADRC, i got the details against that address...
That's why was asking if a address number created, then should be create vendor code too..
You explain me about plant earlier, Now Can you please explain Vendor code example... from address number generated without vendor code generation...
Hi,
This can happen if user changes the delivery address in PO item:
In Purchase Order item details Delivery Address tab user have changed the delivery address which by default comes from
Plant address( from OX10) or from storage location address ( from OX09 ) if you have maintained storage location in PO
So when user changes this value manually like Name ,Street/House number or even if you add a . (dot) in the proposed address, this change creates a entry in ADRC table which you are seeing in PO change history and also update table EKPO-ADRNR ( no LFA1can be found for this ADRNR as no vendor is created)
So by comparing these two address from OX10( or OX09 ) Plant address to your PO delivery address you will identify the change and because of this difference system creates a entry in ADRC table (which you are not finding in LFA1)
And I hope this should help you to identify the root cause of your issue
Edited by: redriver on Dec 10, 2011 5:00 PM
Edited by: redriver on Dec 10, 2011 5:30 PM
looks like a pretty important information, I mean that you are working with one time vendors in your special case.
This means that you will find this correspondend address number in table EKKO instead of LFA1.
And from table EKKO you can then get the vendor number that was used.
A one-time vendor is a very special account group, the "vendor master " is just a Dummy, and the user is forced to enter a valid address when such one-time vendor is used in a PO. the entered address is then stored among all other addresses in ADRC table and is only valid for this specific purchase order.
you can check as well EKPO for this number, even I think that you would not have a match there either.
It is probably an inconsistency that was created because your user changed the vendor somehow while creating this PO.
But I don't think that this has anything to do with the issue that an incorrect condition is copied over.
HI,
First of all how the vendor was deleted ?
If it is through XK06 then it should always show in LFA1 with deletion flag
Is archiving also done with that deleted vendor ?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi
activate Message no. F2128 - Vendor xxxx is marked for deletion.
will show you while changing data.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
in xk06 flag for deletion vendor , lfa1 table has updated but it won't show in the data.
if it is not updated go for debuging by the help of abaper
Regads
Raj.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.