cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SOLAR_EVAL giving Incorrect report for Keywords

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi all,

We have implemented Solution Manager7.1 for our project during Realization phase.

1. I have added all the Managed systems to the Solution Manager.

2. Created the Project Structure in Solar01.

3. Added Config Nodes in Configuration Tab for all the Business Processes.

4. Created Keywords in solar_project_admin and assigned them to the respective Config nodes of Business Process in Solar02.

Now when i am trying to generate the report using SOLAR_EVAL, i am getting the wrong report with respect to Keyword's.

Only 1st two config nodes are getting displayed in the Keyword field and rest all are blank.

Do anyone have any suggestion/solution to the problem. It would be a great help if you can share it with me.

Regards,

Satish Dhanalakoti

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

have you define the key words in documents tab of solar_project_admin against ur project, before used in the solar01,02.

if not so, please do and try.

and update me your flow you are trying in solar_eval

Thanks,

Jansi

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi shivjansi,

I have added the attributes' names in the Keywords in Solar_Project_admin.

I am able to see the Keywords for the 1st two nodes of a Business Process in SOLAR_EVAL and rest of all it is showing as a blank.

Regards,

Satish Dhanalakoti

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Satish,

I think I understood the issue.

The keywords are assigned to the structure, so In this case they have no direct relation to the objects inside the node. Once you run solar_eval, it gets the keywords assigned to that structure node and will list in order along with the objects. Once there is not as many objects as keywords, it'll add empty lines just for the keywords or if you have more objects than keywords, it'll list all the objects and for the first ones the keywords will be listed along.

It would be a problem once a keyword was really missing or a object was missing, but in this case this seem the normal behavior. This design is currently causing many confusions, I was even thinking about document this in details.

I hope you could understand now and I hope I made it clear.

Kind regards, Fabricius