Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

[Former Member]

Hi Payroll Experts,

I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)

When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.

But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.

The followng are the WT details

IN - Period

OCT 2011

/101 Total gross amount 118,897.00

/110 Net payments/deductions 76,070.00-

/550 Statutory net pay 95343

/551 Stat.net recalc.diff. 37,692.00-

/552 Stat.net subs.adjustment 37,692.00-

/559 Bank transfer 34,317.00

/560 Net pay 37,218.00

/563 Claim from previous month 5,609.00

FOR Period

Sept- Oct

/101 Total gross amount 49,213.00

/110 Net payments/deductions 31,721.00-

/550 Statutory net pay 41,529.00

/551 Stat.net recalc.diff. 14,591.00

/552 Stat.net subs.adjustment 23,101.00-

/553 Recalc.diff.to last payr. 37,692.00

/559 Bank transfer 14,591.00

/560 Net pay 14,591.00

/561 Claim 5,609.00

I request some body to throw siome light on the same.

[Former Member]

Hi Experts,

Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,

I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552 in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs

Is it correct?

And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,

some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.

So how do i handle this issue

IS ther any way to solve this differences?

Please Let me know how to solve this issue.

Thanks

[Former Member]

Hi,

1-some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.

1-see claim is always from retro though he has balance now actually if you compare payslip of retro you will see why there id a difference.

2-Please Let me know how to solve this issue.

a-1) stop retro (not recommended)

2) include claims in payslip and tell employees why its happening

Salil

[raghu_c]

In continuation to what Salil has said, also check weather the employee bank details were maintained after payroll was processed in the past periods

Raghu

[Former Member]

Check whether he has a retro payroll run prior to OCT i can see you only mention sept,see if it goes beyond sept,may be you can trace /561 backdated.OR see his IT 0003 and see what date is in his earliest retroactive date there,you may know from which date retro is run.

Trace /561 and compare with that period.

Claim means any statutory payment that was to be deducted from him but remained to be deducted as the earnings were less in that period.

OR have you run any backdated action for him?

salil

[Former Member]

Hi,

First check any master data changes in last month reagarding Absences (LOP) or any deduction wagetypes added due to time management integration (Then you need to run time evaluation correctly then have to process the payroll).

It will be reflect due to rero active accounting only. You can find in payroll log under "DT" table from which wage type it is getting deductions if you are changes IN42, IN43, IN44 will give correct picture regarding allowances (in case deleted IT0014/IT0015 data deleted) and any deuction priorities maintain also it will get claim.

Another Easy way to find first do test run for last month match the payslip (if you have any hard copy) then you can find out the issue.

Edited by: ERP12345 on Nov 21, 2011 11:12 AM