on 09-22-2011 9:09 AM
Hello
in SAP Plant Maintenance (PM), we are assigning persons to work centers.
Some times a strange thing happen when we assign a person to a work center.
The position for the person is updated with a wrong value in HR master data.
We are not given any position in PM, and definitely do not want to update HR master data from PM.
Anyone experienced something like this?
Best regards
Tom Saga
Hi you need to check the consistencies in employee master data (pa30), is the person holding two position at once or check table hrp1001 for person to workcenter relationship.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello
We are using transaction IR02 to assign persons to work centres.
And we assign hundres of persons with no problems.
So why problem with this person?
And we do not understand why EDI is involved in this.
Best regards
Tom
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello
I have now tried to do the same in our test system. And for the particular user I get an error message when doing this.
The screen for "Copy Organizational Assigment" pop up.
And SAP try to fill in the Work centre ID as Position.
ut with error message:
Entry in outbound table not found
Message no. E0400
Diagnosis
No partner profile (outbound parameter) could be found using the following key:
PXCCLNT100/LS//HRMD_A///
This refers to the key fields in table EDP13:
RCVPRN Partner number
RCVPRT Partner type
RCVPFC Partner function
MESTYP Logical message
MESTYP Message code
MESCOD Message function
TEST Test indicator
Procedure
Please check the EDI partner profiles.
***********
We do not understand this. And it only happend with this user, and with all work centres we try to add him to.
Best regards
Tom
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I'm not sure about this but you need to find relationship between work center with position (table HRP1001). For example if person A is a holder of position b which incorporates work center c then if you move person a to work center d it would need adjustment since position b is not related to work center d. I only can imagine that SAP is taking the adjustment by moving the person to position which have work center D relationship.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.