Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

SPL Screening Incorrect Results

Hi Guys

We are on the process of finalizing the Configurations for the Name and Address Screening procedure in GTS.

We have the below settings maintained :-

Control Structure

Search Term Origin - Parallel Comparison from Partner/Sanc List

Condition Elimination Enabled

Detail Control

Done on Name, City and Street Name

Name -

Linkiing operator 'AND'

Relational Operator - Comparison Index in Keyword from Address are Identical

Similarities -

Search Term 65%

Parallel Comparison between SPL/Partner

Originating 65%

Number of Terms in each SPL or Partner

City

Linkiing operator 'AND'

Relational Operator - Comparison Index in Keyword from Address

Similarities -

Search Term 100%

Parallel Comparison between SPL/Partner

Originating 100%

Number of Terms in each SPL and Partner

Street

Linkiing operator 'OR'

Relational Operator - Comparison Index in Keyword from Address

Similarities -

Search Term 65%

Parallel Comparison between SPL/Partner

Originating 65%

Number of Terms in each SPL or Partner

Address Fields Assigned

ADDR_GROUP

CITY1

COUNTRY

NAME1

NAME2

NAME_TEXT

STREETCODE

The above setting is not very efficient, its bringing out incorrect results, any tips or suggestions on what to change and improve?

Thanks

Carl

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

1 Answer

  • Sep 16, 2011 at 01:30 PM

    Hi Carl

    After you changed the customising did you reset the buffers and regenerate the index (SAP note 865433)

    1. Reset Buffers - /SAPSLL/SPL_CUS_APP_BUFF_RESET

    2. Generate Comparison Terms for SPL - /SAPSLL/SPL_CREATE_SEARCHTERMS

    3. Aggregate Comparison Terms - /SAPSLL/SPL_INDEX_CREATE

    4. Generate Comparison Terms for Bus. Partners - /SAPSLL/SPL_CREATE_SEARCHTADRC

    If you haven't done this, it could have caused your incorrect results.

    Also just on a side note The SPL algorithm is optimized on country key. Its recommed to use country as Logical AND operator in customizing.

    Hope this helps,

    Regards

    Ann Marie

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Ann Marie

      Thanks for the answer.

      Looks like the clearing of the buffer was partly one of the solution, the major error was the technical guys forgot to turn the check object selection off for the name.

      Now that both are done looks to be working well.

      And also thanks for the Country check, its true that doing it in conjunction with the name will really help increase the quality of the SPL search.

      Cheers

      Carl