no authorization-user can not approve e_user zspm_bdnp

[Former Member]

Hi All,

My issue is the user is not able to forward the workitem from his inbox. It gives the error " no authorization-user can not approve e_user zspm_bdnp ".

The issue in detail :

The user1 is not able to forward pricing from his CRM workflow inbox of MAPP X-pro Office Employee1 which he recently got responsible for. I tried to set him up as account Manager but it didn't help. He still receives error " no authorization-user can not approve e_user zspm_bdnp ".

Kindly help me in this issue. Whether the error is standard or custom. How to rectify this. why this error occurs.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Try SU53, so you might see which authorisation is missing.

If it doesn't work, use the authorization trace with ST01.

If it still doesn't work, debug the code.

If it does not work, ask help from an authorisation specialist.

Regards,

Karri

[Former Member]

hi,

No, i didn't try SU53. Should i try SU53 for that user.

Thanks

[Former Member]

Hi,

Yes, Try SU53 after the Error message when u try to forward in the users login.

Regards,

Devananda A J

[former_member185167]

Unbelievable

[Former Member]

Hi ,

Thanks for the reply. Actually i am talking from the WF Admin point of view.

The issue came to me that user1 is not able to forward the work item. he is getting the error "no authorization-user can not approve e_user zspm_bdnp".

The user asks me what is the reason for this error. The user has been assigned manager role. but he gets this error.

What may be the problem.

Kindly help me

Thanks,

S.Velsankar

[former_member185167]

Hello,

Did you or did you not try SU53?

regards

Rick Bakker

hanabi technology

[Former Member]

Hi,

After trying to forward if check SU53 it will show what is the Authorization object missing for that person.

Regards,

Devananda A J

[Former Member]

Hi,

Can you help me how to debug the code. when forwarding. I am new to workflow . kindly guide me karri.

[former_member185167]

Didn't SU53 show what the problem was?