Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Raw Material Cost Estimate - No split between cost component

Dears,

I need to execute a material cost estimate considering the Purchasing Info Record (PIR) where 3 different conditions are present:

1) PB00

2) FRB1

3) RUC1

The scope is:

- linking PB00 to cost component 1

- linking FRB1 to cost component 2

- linking RUC1 to cost component 3

Cost components are already created.

I did following steps:

- creation PIR with these 3 conditions (transaction ME11)

  • PB00 10,00 EUR @ 1 KG

  • FRB1 2,00 EUR @ 1 KG

  • RUC1 3,00 EUR @ 1 KG

- link condition types to origin groups (transaction OKYO)

  • FRB1 linked to FRB1

  • RUC1 linked to RUC1

- link origin groups to cost component (transaction OKTZ)

  • PB00, is linked to cost component 1 without origin group, but using only account coming from T030 table

  • FRB1 is linked to cost component 2 using origin group FRB1 and the same account used for condition PB00 coming from T030 table

  • RUC1 is linked to cost component 3 using origin group RUC1 and the same account used for condition PB00 coming from T030 table

At this moment, when I try to execute the cost estimate with transaction CK11N, the split is not done, and all condition types (all amounts) are linked to cost component 1. The set-up done in OKYO is not considered by the system.

In the material master there's any origin group, if I try to fill in origin group FRB1 all condition types (all amounts) are linked to component 2, and if I try to change the origin group in the material master from FRB1 to RUC1, all condition types (all amounts) are linked to component 3 --> this means that the set-up done OKTZ is correctly considered by the system to link the origin group to the cost components.

The problem is that the system reads the origin group from the material master, instead of transaction OKYO.

How can I solve this problem?

Thanks and Regards,

Jody

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Assigned Tags

Related questions

1 Answer

  • Best Answer
    author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Sep 06, 2011 at 11:19 PM

    Pl verify following two things -

    Check valuation variant.

    Strategy sequence should have 'L - Price from purchasing info-record' and Sub-strategy should be 'A Quotation price via condition table' or 'B PO price via condition table'.

    OKYO setting should have valuation variant associated with your costing variant, along with other details (dont leave that field blank).

    Let us know if that works.

    Regards,

    Subodh

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Subodh,

      many thanks for your reply.

      The problem was in the strategy defined in the valuation variant.

      I changed into L-A and now it is working, even if I changed also the condition types in order to include them in the net price (considered by strategy L-A) instead of in the effective price.

      Many Thanks again.

      Regards,

      Jody

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.