on 08-31-2011 5:43 AM
Hi
This has just started happening , when i run a work flow indiviually or in sequential no problems .
but if create any new work flows with parralel (not sequential) processing or a parrallel data flows in one work flow.
i get all sort of syntax errors - but running the flow indiviually or in sequential no problems
eg random errors - parrallel
(12.1) 08-31-11 10:42:32 (E) (17973:0001) R3S-140101: |Dataflow SE_ERP_OSRQLD_LTPLATS
ABAP program </oracle/DS1/sapdata1/ds_store/abap/ZRBUT000.aba> syntax error: <No open "IF" statement>.
(12.1) 08-31-11 10:42:32 (E) (17973:0001) R3S-140101: |Dataflow SE_ERP_OSRQLD_LTPLATS
ABAP program </oracle/DS1/sapdata1/ds_store/abap/ZRBUT000.aba> syntax error: <No open "IF" statement>.
same data flows differnet error - WTF?
12.1) 08-31-11 10:48:10 (E) (18789:0001) R3S-140101: |Dataflow SE_ERP_OSRQLD_LTPLATS
ABAP program </oracle/DS1/sapdata1/ds_store/abap/ZRBUT000.aba> syntax error: <Incorrect nesting: Before the statement
"ENDFORM",>.
(12.1) 08-31-11 10:48:11 (E) (18790:0001) R3S-140101: |Dataflow SE_ERP_OSRQLD_LTPLATS
ABAP program </oracle/DS1/sapdata1/ds_store/abap/ZRBUT000.aba> syntax error: <Incorrect nesting: Before the statement
"ENDFORM",>.
ITs become very unstable.. i can run previous created data flows in parralel but any new ones - get differnet syntax errros..
any ideas...
I have data services XI 3.1
You can run the Work flows parallel if they are ALL parallel. You can't connect some of them and leave some to run parallel.
If none of the WFs are conected to others and still you get his error, my suggestion is remove all of them from your job, save the job, then add them back to the job as you had done before. It might sounds unusual but happend to resolve the issue for me before.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks ...yes i realise that ..you can't run sequential and parallel within a flow ...
i'll have tried what you have suggested some times it works ..most times not. Some combinations of data flow can be run SOMETIMES in parralel but other conbinations never work...so i'm stumped..
Edited by: mic jones on Sep 5, 2011 2:45 AM
mic -
I would suggest you to see below URL by Werner to get more insights on degree of parellalism
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/DegreeofParallelism
hope it helps
thx
Deep
Thanks i have seen this article - to see if its a work around - but it would be nice if you could
just use the native parrallel flows instead of working around with a case statement...as i said
parrelel flows do work but any new ones ..don't 'sometimes get random syntax errors .
..seems to be some kind of meta data corruption..when the generated code ..gets truncated..i had already spent half a day working around this ..
..with no luck..A case split is worth a go...as a work around.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.