Incorrect Plan values on S_ALR_87013533

[Former Member]

Hi experts,

We are planning projects via material components to network activities.

Issue over here is initially few materials were having MAP value as

zero & those materials have been used for project planning.

So plan values were based on those zero values & plan value was not

100% correct.

Now we have updated material master with correct MAP value, but still

on S_ALR_87013533 report shows incorrect plan values for said project.

Is there way to update those projects with correct plan values without

reassigning materials to projects in order to reflect correct plan

values on S_ALR_87013533 report?

Beat regards,

SL

[former_member203108 · Accepted solution]

Why dont you re-run the network costing for those projects and check the report

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Dear Mohamed Rafi ,

Thanks For the quick respond...

You are advicing to run CJ9K?? I already run that but didnt work, just give warning message "Activity type not entered

" & still showing previous values. Is there any other T codes to recalculate plan values ???

Thanks & regards,

SL

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

In CJ20N try to calculate costs and update costs. Go to Edit-Costs-Calculate Costs/Update Costs. Check if this works.

Regards,

Gokul

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Gokul,

That also not working

Thanks & regards,

SL

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Did you try CJEN and run the report?

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Thanks for your input.

CJEN also not working.

Thanks & regards,

SL

[pradeep_mahamuni · Accepted solution]

hi,

please check for your network costing the key you maintained to pick up the material price what option you have selected ? is MAP option is maintained there ?

1 thing i wat to clarify that MAP is maintained at plant level and for project when any material is assigned then that is restricetd for that project........ seniors please update this if i am wrong

regards,

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Pradeep,

Coting variant is standard (PS02) for network type parameters. 1st priority is Standard price(we are not defined on MM01)

2nd is Moving Average Price(MAP)

For the initial planning when material is assigned it picks the MAP value for that particulat plant which material component is attached.

In this case how SAP is behave is logical , that means planed value is based on MAP which is available at the point of planning.

Here our requirement is to mechanism to refresh that value with new MAP values as and when required.

Thanks & regards,

SL

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

If you want cost to be updated with latest MAP, hten you can opt for 'automatic cost planning' flag in network. this will enable calculation of planned costs whenever you are saving the project.

regards,

mahendra

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Dear mahendra,

Thanks for feedback.

You mean "Plan cost calculation " on conrtol tab of network?? In our case we have set it as <4 Update Plan cost>.

I could not find any flag as such on config.

Regards,

SL

[Former Member]

Hi SL,

Please adjust your value category customizing according to the following

settings:

1) In transaction CJVC, all yellow and/or red lights have to eliminated

by assigning each cost element/commitment item/statistical key figure

according to the following rules:

1.1) Each cost element/commitment item/statistical key figure should

be assigned to a value category, EVEN if its values should NOT

be updated to table Project Information Database, table RPSCO.

In this case please create an assignment to a value category

and activate its 'suppress' indicator. All values basing on an

assignment to this value category won't be updated to RPSCO.

1.2) Each cost element/commitment item/stat. key figure has to be

assigned exactly once to a value category. Assigning them to

more or less than one value category will lead to unpredictable

results.

1.3) Only

1.3.1) cost elements of the same cost element type,

1.3.2) commitment items of the same item category and

1.3.3) statistical key figures of the same unit of measure

and the same KF category are allowed to be assigned to

one value category. Mixed assignments will lead to

unpredictable results, like mixing costs and revenues in

columns or rows.

2) If all yellow and/or red lights in transaction CJVC are eliminated,

please rebuild the Project Information Database (table RPSCO) by

transaction CJEN. Without this, changes from 1.1)-1.3) won't have

any effect.

3) Please rebuild the assigned values by transaction CJBN.

Could you also review notes 51971, 327081, 676123?

Best regards,

Enrique

[former_member230675]

please remove the materials from network and attach again, i think master data changes not yet influenced the attached materials.

[Former Member]

Dear Abdul,

Thanks for your feed back.

Reassigning materials is last option for us, we have around thousand projects with many material componnents.

our requirement is to recalculate cost value with latest MAP in quick steps.

Thanks & regards,

SL

[former_member230675]

> Reassigning materials is last option for us, 

I think better to go for it.. as the master data changes won't effect the earlier transaction data.