LSMW Vendor Master Fax Number and Mail address upload issue

[Former Member]

Hi ,

I am using a LSMW for Vendor Master Fax Number and Mail address upload.

LSMW is using Standard Batch Input method using program RFBIKR00.

Problem is that the fields Fax number (BLFM1-YYFAXNR) and Mail Address (BLFM1-YYMAILADR) are uploaded correctly in the development system.

Same LSMW we have transported to quality system and it is not uploading the fields.

I have checked the structure BLFM1 in both the systems; there is no difference in the structures.

I am not getting the problem as the LSMW in both systems is same.

Please help me resolve this problem

Thanks & Regards,

Mozilla

[JL23]

the structure BLFM1 has no fields like BLFM1-YYFAXNR and BLFM1-YYMAILADR in a standard SAP system.

This is probably an home made extension.

To get this fields posted, you have to have a modified program.

I guess this program is not transported to your Q and Prod-systems

The LSMW itself has only the reference that it shall use the program for the input.

In general the standard batch input does not support the fax number, because the fax number is not stored in table LFA1, it is stored in central address tables. The batch input was developed before SAP implemented central address management.

You usually have to load the vendor master in 2 steps, the vendor master itself is one step, and the new address with fax and mail etc is a second step.

Please read related OSS notes: 306275 and 384462

[madhu_vadlamani]

Hi Mozialla,

It is little surprise. You do one thing that two fields map again manually in quality system. This will work.

Regards,

Madhu.

[Former Member]

Hi Madhu,

Thanks for the reply.

I tried removing the mapping and doing it manually in quality system as well.

But its not working

Regards,

Mozila

[Former Member]

Hi

The problem is solved.

There was a difference in the standard program RFBIKR00 version in development and quality systems.

The BDC field name and field value were not passed for these custom fields in the standard program in quality system.

I guess the transport of the structure was not proper. Any other reasons why it can be so???

Thanks & Regards,

Mozila