SAP for Utilities Discussions
Connect with fellow SAP users to share best practices, troubleshoot challenges, and collaborate on building a sustainable energy future. Join the discussion.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Need to Transfer the Reco Key for payments stuck for clarification

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Friends,

I have created a lot with a */ wrong contract account in selection field with the payment details in fp25. After saving and posting i am getting a message "Postings made, postprocessing is required". This means that it will not allow me to transfer through FPG4.

In the List item i am getting this message "No assignment of amount 6,000.00- INR possible due to selection specifications".

The problem is that i want this payment to stay in clarification account and pass the bank entry in R/3 by transferring the data.

Please help me in this case.

Regards,

Charvi

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

AmlanBanerjee
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Charvi,

Take the lot and go to transaction code FP05FIK.

This transactions assigns a new reconciliation key to all those lots which are in the status "postprocessing required" i.e. have items that are in the clarification Worklist.

Give the lot no. and untick the test run. This will generate a new reco key. So all tyhe items under which are in payment CWL under that lot are now saved under the new reco key.

Now take the old reconciltion key and transfer that to GL.

Hope it helps..

Thanks,

Amlan

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5

AmlanBanerjee
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Charvi,

Take the lot and go to transaction code FP05FIK.

This transactions assigns a new reconciliation key to all those lots which are in the status "postprocessing required" i.e. have items that are in the clarification Worklist.

Give the lot no. and untick the test run. This will generate a new reco key. So all tyhe items under which are in payment CWL under that lot are now saved under the new reco key.

Now take the old reconciltion key and transfer that to GL.

Hope it helps..

Thanks,

Amlan

0 Kudos

Hello Amlan,

Thanks a lot...The issue is resolved. One more query, if i want to reverse a payment lot is it possible, if so please could you tell me the transaction for the same.

Regards,

Charvi

0 Kudos

Hi,

Reversal of a payment lot is possible.....

Take the payment lot and goto t.code FP08M. Give the payment lot number in the reconciliation key field.

Choose reverse documents and press execute.

If the payment lot contains a large number of items, its better to execute it in background ..

Hope it helps...

Thanks,

Amlan

0 Kudos

Hi Amlan,

I am a developer and new to IS-U. I am getting the same Status message 'postings made, postprocessing is required'. There is a custom program in my project which takes a file with Contract Account, date, amount, payment type and other details, it inserts data in DFKKZP table and thats how we can see the new lot in FP25. I checked all the Contract Accounts in the input file are available in FKKVKP table.Please advise what other mistakes or reasons can return 'postings made, postprocessing is required' Status message in FP25.

Thanks and Regards,

Nimit Kapoor.

0 Kudos

Hi,

Firstly, to clear things, the status message "Posting made, postprocessing is required" means that either all items or some items in the payment lot\Check lot has hit the payment clarification worklist (FPCPL) and has not actually hit the account.

There can be many reasons for this status message-

(a) Main\Subs not configured for payments

(b) Clearing settlement rules not configured correctly for incoming payments.

(c) The values from the input file are not getting correctly passed in the payment lot transfer program, RFKKZE00.

Go to t,code FPCPL, give the payment lot no. and execute and then try to post one of the item from the clarification to the account. During posting, you will definately get some error which you can use as a start point for your further analysis.

Finally,when you are posting a query can you open a new thread instead of using an existing answered one.?

Thanks,

Amlan