cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Correcting the duplicate number range for 57 f 4 challan

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Friends ,

By mistake I have maintained same number range for both my series group in J1I9 under object J_1I57FC.

Intially I was doing sub con transaction only for one plant , but recently I started doing sub con transaction of the other plant .

It allows me to create 57F4 challan in the second plant , but while using the challan number in MIGO , it shows an error message .

I cannot change the number range for the second plant now because the 57F4 challan has been generated .

Kindly guide me how can I correct the above problem.

Thanks in advance

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

former_member187989
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
It allows me to create 57F4 challan in the second plant , 
but while using the challan number in MIGO , it shows an error message .

What is error message & no. ?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi ,

Following message shown

Challan 0000000002 not valid, Material document having different vendor

Message no. 4F273

former_member187989
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Check you might have entered challan no. & year correctly in GR or post GR and reconcile material doc. with challan later using J1IFQ.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

No I have checked the transaction for challan number & year correctly.

What I would like to know , is there no way of correcting the number range incase there is duplication or mistake as it has happened in my case.

Can somebody provide some solution

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Friends,

Can somebody provide me some solution

Thanks in advance

former_member182379
Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

This is a problem for 57F4 challan number range you cannot use same number range for two different series group even while maintaining number range system not issue any message , i faced the same problem then from this fiscal year we have used two separate number range so better create new number range and assing in subcontracting attibutes as this we faced in development for the GR for which we found the problem is not solve.

regards,

zafar