cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Risk not mitigated

Former Member
0 Kudos

i hve created a RISK and assigned a Mitigation Id to it. But the risk still appears in Risk Analysis(BUT,IT SHOULD NOT APPEAR), where the option of 'exclude Mitigated Risk' is selected. Could any one tell, why is this appearing and how to mitigate the Risk(i.e not to appear in Risk Analysis)

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Plaban,

The reason this could happen is that after assigning the mitigation control to the risk, you may not have done user synchronization.

Pl. do user synchronization and then check, this should solve the problem.

Regards,

Ankit

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi ankit, i am doing RA at Role level. So no user is involved here.Moreover, Mitigation control defines relation between, Mitigation Id and Risk Id. So, even if I do User Synchronisation, there would be no difference in RA result, since User Synhronization will update User data from Backend and not Mitigation ID(which is present in GRC ONLY).

Former Member
0 Kudos

In the configuration there is a parameter to ignore mitigated risks. You need to enable that.

Regards,

Chinmaya

Former Member
0 Kudos

i have posted question, only after checking these parameters. So, i am still looking for the reason and solution

ganesh_s7
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Plaban,

Have you done a Batch Risk Analysis for Roles in 'Incremental' mode?

After you map the risk to mitigation, you need to run 'Barch Risk Analysis' for 'Roles' for the change to be realised for Risk Analysis.

In Production Systems, there will be a daily or weekly job that does this. Form what i read i assume that you are checking in Test System. Kindly run the Batch Analysis, check and let know.

Rgds

Ganesh.S

Former Member
0 Kudos

Have you set up the mitigating control on user or role?

Regards,

Chinmaya