Skip to Content

Intrastat GR consolidation wrong when there is a cancelation mvt 102

Hello everybody,

We are running the intrastat extractor RMIMST00 and we are meeting a problem with cancelation movement 102.

Indeed, the intrastat extractor will try to match the mvt 102 against mvt 101 in order to "clear" the quantities that have been canceled but this cancelation mvt 102 will be re-used accross many periods and hence cleared several times...

Here is an example that will help you understand the issue we have:

In period n, goods receipt (mvt 101) of 1000 pc and afterwards cancelation of 400 pc (mvt 102) hence the Intrastat extractor will match mvts 101 and 102 and display a goods receipt of 600 pc. So far so good...

The issue appears in the next reporting period (n1) where the cancelation mvt 102 is again used and matched against the goods receipts of period n1.

If we continue using the same example, say we do a goods receipt of 2000 pc in period n1 (and there are no goods mvt cancelation in the same period) then the Intrastat report will report a qty of 1600 pc (GR of 2000 pc in period n1 MINUS 400 pc coming from the cancelation in period n).

The calculation of the reported qtys in period n+1 is hence wrong...

I have tried to look for OSS notes and SDN threads about this issue but couldn't find anything... and it seems weired that this has not been spoted before....

We are about to send an OSS note to SAP but before that I wished to know if anyone had come accross the same issue ? If yes, how did you fix the problem ?

Thanks and regards.


Edited by: Mouaz BEN REDJEB on May 31, 2011 7:52 PM

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

2 Answers

  • Best Answer
    Posted on May 31, 2011 at 07:12 PM

    If you have a problem in Intrastat, then always mention the country. Even it is a Euroean requirment, it is in detail quite different from country to country.

    Please describe what you entered in your selection screen of transaction MEIS and what checkmarks are set.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Thanks Jurgen for your answer.

      I have seen this OSS note before but discarded it as we are in SP SAPKH60408 and the note is included in SP SAPKH60407.

      However, thanks to your message, I had a closer look to the correction to implement in this OSS note and, as you said, the issue we have is may be a side effect of this correction.

      We will get in touch with SAP today and I hope to post in the thread a feedack soon (with comments on the correction I hope...).

      Thanks a lot.

  • Posted on Jul 05, 2011 at 08:48 AM

    Issue is fixed by OSS note 1562102.

    Thread is closed.

    Thanks and regards.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.