Issue :- OW wage type is getting grouped under AW(/303) on retro run.
Example...
Payroll in April:-
WT-9000 -Employee basic salary -5000 SGD u2013Ow
WT-9100 -Night shift allowance -600 SGD u2013OW
So total OW is u2013 5600 sgd
OW Capping at 4500 u2013
So employee u201315.5 % - 900
Employer u2013 20% - 698
Payroll in May:-
WT-9000 -Employee basic salary -5000 SGD u2013Ow
WT-9100 -Night shift allowance -600 SGD u2013OW
WT-9100 -Night shift allowance (new record for April month u2013 thru retro) - 200 SGD u2013 System taking this as AW thru rule RC10.
How even though the wage type is marked as OW during retro it is getting grouped under AW(/303).What is the business logic?
Question from user is :- Why the wage type(Which is originally marked as OW) is behaving as OW when it is a on actual pay period and when its on retro it is getting added up to the AW amounts.
Additional information u2013 When I have checked the retro for basic salary (OW) also the difference amount is getting calculated as AW.
Regards
Thomas
Edited by: Thomas Padiyara on May 26, 2011 9:51 AM
Edited by: Thomas Padiyara on May 26, 2011 11:09 AM