Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Vendor maintained for one material being extended for another material-

Hi experts,

I have situation where, one of my existing vendor needs to be extended to other material along with the existing material.

secondly, the vendor belong to let say Australia and my plant is in Indonesia. I have maintained the vendor schema group for both Indonesia and Australia.

So, in the above situation, please help in:

1) Shall I continue with existing vendor # or create new one or some other modifications are reqd?

2) Vendor Schema group, which one is to be used Australian or Indonesian. I have used both with austrailian vendor schema grroup, I am not been able to create PIR and update condition table in the PIR, while with Indonesian vendor schema group, I am able to create PIr and also update the condition table in PIR.

Please provide experts advice!!!

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

3 Answers

  • Best Answer
    author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on May 23, 2011 at 09:40 AM

    If your schema group are different for both countries, then it is better to create two seperate vendor codes. As it will affect pricing procedure.

    If pricing schema group is same then you could have extended the same vendor code (Company code/Purchase Organization wise). In such case vendor subrange or Plant data will fulfil your requirement.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      okie, If i go for the second option of creating VSR, I am not been able to maintain vendor schema group for the sub-range vendor.

      So, is it fine, If i go forward with maintaining vendor schema group in main purchasing data and not in sub-range vendor and create PIR.

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on May 24, 2011 at 05:47 AM

    Hi,

    Please check condition records if they are maintained. What about purchase organization, is same purchase organization responsible for both the plants

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Yes, I have checked the transaction code ME1M and it is showing no condition record maintained status with australian vendor schema group and status of condition record maintained with Indonesia vendor schema group.

      Yes, both are using same purchasing organization.

  • Posted on May 23, 2011 at 08:37 AM

    How many plants & co.cd do u have?

    As per ur query i understand,that u have one plant in australia & one in Indoneasia

    Am i right,Pl provide clea inputs

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi,

      Yes, I have plant in australia and Indonesia. This particular procurement is done for indonesian plant with australian vendor.

      I am using vendor schema group of Australia. Due to which, when I am creating PIR with above material and vendor combination, I am not been able to open condition table. but, when I use Indonesia vendor schema group, i am able to open condition group and do changes in the Net price.

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.