Skip to Content
author's profile photo
Former Member

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt m

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?

We try to explain better, today we've done a test:

Step 1 : We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.

Step 2 : We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.

Step 3 : Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).

And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:

PLANT1---- -STO1 ---- 562---- - Mat. Doc.1


01.05.2011--


500- ST

PLANT1---- -STO1 -- -561


Mat. Doc.2
05.05.2011
--


1000 ST

And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:

G/LAccount1--


DocumentNo1
01.05.2011
-- 99 --


500- EUR

G/LAccount1--


DocumentNo2
05.05.2011
-- 89 --


1000 EUR

We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!

Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Follow
  • Get RSS Feed

3 Answers

  • Posted on May 05, 2011 at 04:28 PM

    once you post the stock receipt it is possible to withdraw with a posting date earlier , upto the beginning of the period. means the date of transaction is subseqent, just the posting date is prior.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on May 05, 2011 at 04:42 PM

    In MMRV,Remove tick mark - Allow back posting.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on May 05, 2011 at 05:42 PM

    Hi,

    Though sap allows like this ,, the document created will be with the date of the actual posting system date. If you look into the MSEG table you will get to know this.

    In theory .. this kind of practice should not be allowed .

    since this is a 562 which is a individual entry may be system would have allowed.you try a 102 .

    Regards,

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded